• Home
  • Browse Issues
    • In Press
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issue
    • Past Issues
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Bibliographic Listings
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
    • Retraction Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Disclaimer
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit Article
  • Contact

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Facebook Twitter Instagram
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Submit Article Author Guidelines
  • Home
  • Browse Issues
    1. In Press
    2. Current Issue
    3. Special Issue
    4. Past Issues
    5. View All

    A Study of Nitrosamine Impurities and Regulations Governing their Presence in Drug Products

    September 22, 2023

    Phyto-Pharmacological Importance with Nutritional Potential of Eleusine coracana Linn.: A Review

    September 20, 2023

    Type3c Diabetes Mellitus

    September 20, 2023

    A Study on BioBetters: Various Aspects and Regulatory Approval Process

    September 20, 2023

    A Study of Nitrosamine Impurities and Regulations Governing their Presence in Drug Products

    September 22, 2023

    Phyto-Pharmacological Importance with Nutritional Potential of Eleusine coracana Linn.: A Review

    September 20, 2023

    Type3c Diabetes Mellitus

    September 20, 2023

    A Study on BioBetters: Various Aspects and Regulatory Approval Process

    September 20, 2023

    A Study of Nitrosamine Impurities and Regulations Governing their Presence in Drug Products

    September 22, 2023

    Phyto-Pharmacological Importance with Nutritional Potential of Eleusine coracana Linn.: A Review

    September 20, 2023

    Type3c Diabetes Mellitus

    September 20, 2023

    A Study on BioBetters: Various Aspects and Regulatory Approval Process

    September 20, 2023

    A Study of Nitrosamine Impurities and Regulations Governing their Presence in Drug Products

    September 22, 2023

    Phyto-Pharmacological Importance with Nutritional Potential of Eleusine coracana Linn.: A Review

    September 20, 2023

    Type3c Diabetes Mellitus

    September 20, 2023

    A Study on BioBetters: Various Aspects and Regulatory Approval Process

    September 20, 2023

    A Study of Nitrosamine Impurities and Regulations Governing their Presence in Drug Products

    September 22, 2023

    Phyto-Pharmacological Importance with Nutritional Potential of Eleusine coracana Linn.: A Review

    September 20, 2023

    Type3c Diabetes Mellitus

    September 20, 2023

    A Study on BioBetters: Various Aspects and Regulatory Approval Process

    September 20, 2023
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Bibliographic Listings
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Copyright Policy
    • Retraction Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Disclaimer
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit Article
  • Contact
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
Home»JPHI»Vol 13 Issue 3 (Fulltext)»Simultaneous Estimation of Gallic Acid, Vasicine, Pterostilbene and Piperine Using RP-HPLC Method from Ayurvedic Proprietary Formulations
Vol 13 Issue 3 (Fulltext)

Simultaneous Estimation of Gallic Acid, Vasicine, Pterostilbene and Piperine Using RP-HPLC Method from Ayurvedic Proprietary Formulations

July 21, 2023Updated:July 24, 202324 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email
Sanjay U Nipanikar1*, Pravin S Surwade2, Ankita R Kasabe3, Priyanka B Patil3 and Sachin A Upasani4
Author informationArticle notesCopyright and License informationPDFCitations

1MD (Ayu) Chief Technical Officer (CTO), Ari Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., INDIA

2(Quality Assurance) Executive-Analytical, Ari Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., INDIA

3(Quality Assurance) Research Associate, Ari Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., INDIA

4(Pharmaceutical Medicine), Assistant General Manager (AGM)-Technical, Ari Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., INDIA

Corresponding author.

Correspondence: Dr. Sanjay U Nipanikar Chief Technical Officer (CTO), Ari Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Office No. 107, 1st Floor, World Trade Centre Pune, Tower 1, S. No.1, Opp. EON SEZ, Kharadi, Pune-411014, Maharashtra, INDIA. Email: sanjay.n@arihealthcare.in
Received April 21, 2023; Revised May 01, 2023; Accepted June 01, 2023.
Copyright ©2023 Author (s)
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Citation

1. Nipanikar SU, Surwade PS, Kasabe AR, Patil PB, Upasani SA. Simultaneous Estimation of Gallic Acid, Vasicine, Pterostilbene and Piperine Using RP-HPLC Method from Ayurvedic Proprietary Formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation [Internet]. 2023 Jul 8;13(3):656–65. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.13.3.082
Copy to clipboard
Published in: International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 21 July 2023; 13(3): 656-665.Published online: 21 July 2023DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.13.3.082

Contents

  • ABSTRACT
  • INTRODUCTION
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • RESULTS
  • DISCUSSION
  • CONCLUSION
  • References

ABSTRACT

Introduction

A simple, accurate, precise, sensitive, and validated RP-HPLC method was developed for simultaneous estimation of Gallic Acid (GA), Vasicine (VS), Pterostilbene (PTS) and Piperine (PP) from Ayurvedic Proprietary Formulations developed in two different dosage forms viz. Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule.

Materials and Methods

The optimized chromatographic condition was used for separation on Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 (5 um 4.6 x 250 mm), Rheodyne injector with volume of 20 uL and mobile phase consisting of Solvent A (70 percent methanol) and solvent B [10 nm Hexane sulfonic acid, Acetonitrile and Glacial Acetic acid (70:30:1)] in composition of 95: 05 v/v with isocratic elution for 40 min at flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Quantification was carried out using a photodiode array detector at 280 nm. The method was validated in accordance with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines.

Results and Conclusion

No chromatographic interference from syrup and capsule excipients was analyzed. Hence, the present analytical method is applicable for simultaneous determination of GA, VS, PTS and PP in Ayurvedic proprietary formulations.

Keywords: Gallic Acid (GA), RP-HPLC, Piperine (PP), Pterostilbene (PTS), Vasicine (VS)

INTRODUCTION

It has been estimated that not less than 80% of people in the world are relying on herbal medicines. Since last few decades, use of herbal medicines has been increasing for accomplishment of different therapeutic needs.1–3 This influences research and development (R&D) sector of pharmaceutical industries to achieve desired scientific quality standards in herbal medicinal products. Medicinal activity of herbs is primarily depend upon presence of secondary metabolites or phytochemicals. Identification, isolation, quantification, purification, and structural characterization of these phytochemicals with various assessment techniques help to improve the quality of finished products.1–3

Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule are Ayurvedic proprietary formulations manufactured by Ari Healthcare Private Limited for the management of menstrual problems such as dysmenorrhea, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, hypomenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, amenorrhea, PCOS, menorrhagia, metrorrhagia and menometrorrhagia.4–6 Both formulations contain Saraca indica (Ashoka bark) extract, Adhatoda vasica (Vasa leaf) extract, Pterocarpus marsupium (Bijaka stem) extract and Trikatu extract as key ingredients in combination with other ingredients. Gallic Acid (GA), Vasicine (VS), Pterostilbene (PTS) and Piperine (PP) are major marker compounds considerably responsible for pharmacological actions of both the formulations.4–12

Gallic acid or 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid is one of the most abundant phenolic acids of many plants responsible for anti-inflammatory, free radical scavenging and antioxidant activities.7 Vasicine (peganine) is a quinazoline alkaloid. It is one of the major chemical compounds found in Adhatoda vasica. VS chemically characterized as 1,2,3,9-Tetrahydropyrrolo[2,1-b]quinazolin-3-ol. VS is reported to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulator activities.8 Pterostilbene (trans-3,5-dimethoxy-40-hydroxystilbene) is a natural polyphenol and a dimethyl ether analog of resveratrol. Various research studies have reported that PTS is useful in the management of gynecological disorders, hematological diseases and vascular dysfunction.9 Research studies showed that pterostilbene treatment significantly increases uterus and ovarian index, FSH, LH and regulates secretion of gonadotropin hormones.10 Piperine (C17H19NO3) is an alkaloid found in Piper longum and Piper nigrum. PP is potent bioavailability enhancer. It exerts antioxidant, antiplatelet, anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, hepatoprotective, antithyroid and antitumor activities.11,12

Reverse-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) is one of the prime options of phytochemical analysis with advancement of isocratic and gradient elution.13–15 It is a sophisticated method available for estimation of GA, VS, PTS and PP individually or in combination with other molecules.13–21 As estimation of GA, VS, PTS and PP individually is time and cost consuming by HPLC; this study was aimed towards the development of cost efficient method with less time requirement for simultaneous separation and determination of GA, VS, PTS and PP. In order to standardize Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule an attempt was made to develop simultaneous determination of four different marker compounds by using RP-HPLC method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Instrumentation

The chromatography was performed on water (Waters e2695 Alliance system with a 2996 PDA) HPLC instrument equipped with Photo diode Array Detector with wavelength range of 210 nm to 400 nm and empowers software. Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 (4.6 x 250 mm, 5 μ particle size) was used as stationary phase. Rheodyne manual injector with 100 μL capacity loop was used. Sartorius with weighing capacity of 0.1 mg – 220 g was used as analytical balance, pH meter of Labman and bath sonicator of LABTEK was used in the study.

Reagents and Materials

HPLC-grade solvents such as methanol, acetonitrile, glacial acetic acid, water and hexane-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt were purchased from Merck Life Science Private Limited, Mumbai, India. The reference standards were purchased from Natural Remedies Limited, Bangalore, India. Details of standards are mentioned in Table 1.

Sl. No. Name of Standard Batch Number Potency (%)
1 Gallic Acid (GA) T12K021 99.0
2 Vasicine (VS) T22E155 98.2
3 Pterostilbene (PTS) H220659 95.0
4 Piperine (PP) T13D040 98.0
Table 1:

List of standards.

Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule were developed and supplied by Ari Healthcare Private Limited, Pune. Both dosage forms contain Saraca indica (Ashoka bark) extract, Aloe vera (Kumari leaf) extract, Pterocarpus marsupium (Bijaka stem) extract, Symplocos racemosa (Lodhra bark) extract, Caesalpinie bonducella (Latakaranja seed) extract, Adhatoda vasica (Vasa leaf) extract, Carum carvi (Krishna-Jiraka fruit) extract, Apium graveolens (Ajamoda fruits) extract, Trikatu extract as classical Ayurvedic formulation, Pushyanuga Choorna and Tankana and Kasisa Bhasma.

Preparation of Solutions

Preparation of Standard-stock Solutions

Four different standards were prepared namely Gallic Acid (GA), Vasicine (VS), Pterostilbene (PTS) and Piperine (PP). The standard stock solutions were prepared by dissolving 10 mg of each standard in 10 mL of methanol to obtain concentration 1000 μg/mL (1000 ppm).

Preparation of Working-standard Solution

From the standard stock solution 1 mL of each standards solution was pipette out and diluted with methanol up to 10 mL in volumetric flask to obtain concentration 100 μg/mL (100 ppm) as working standard solution.

Preparation of Calibration Curve

A calibration curve was established with seven different concentrations which were prepared by diluting working standard solution at concentrations ranging from 6 to 18 μg/mL. The dilutions are given in Table 2.

Sl. No. Concentration (μg/mL) Dilution
1 6 1.5 25
2 8 2.0 25
3 10 2.5 25
4 12 3.0 25
5 14 3.5 25
6 16 4.0 25
7 18 4.5 25
Table 2:

Dilutions for linearity.

Preparation of Solvents

Solvent A was prepared using 70% methanol. The ratio of distill water to methanol was 30:70. Solvent B was prepared by solubilizing 4.1248 gm of hexane-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt in mill-Q water (1000 mL), and pH was adjusted with glacial acetic acid to 3.5. A mixture of hexane-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt and acetonitrile (70:30%v/v) were mixed, filtered and degassed.

Mobile Phase Preparation

Mobile phase was prepared using solvent A and B in ratio of 95:5% v/v.

Method Development

Depending on solubility, stability and suitability of standard solution, various compositions of mobile phase were performed to obtain sharp peak with good resolution. Individual standards and sample solutions were allowed to run in different mobile phase compositions to obtain better results. The optimized method was preferred because it gave sharper peak and good resolution at absorbance of 280 nm.

Chromatographic Conditions

The details on optimized parameters of chromatographic conditions for estimation of GA, VS, PTS and PP are mentioned in Table 3.

Sl. No. Parameter Optimized condition
1 Mobile Phase (95:05 v/v)
2 Column Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 (5 µm 4.6 x 250 mm)
3 Flow rate 0.5 mL/min
4 Absorbance 280 nm
5 Injection Volume 20 µL
6 Column Temperature 25°C
7 Sample Temperature 25°C
Table 3:

Optimized condition for standard solution.

Preparation of sample and test solution

Accurately 100 mg capsule powder and 5000 mg of syrup solution were weighed in 50 mL of volumetric flask. About 40 mL of methanol was added and solutions were sonicated on ultrasonic water bath for 30 min at room temperature. Then solutions were allowed to cool at room temperature. Further, volume was made up to the mark with methanol. The resulting solutions were filtered with Whatman’s filter paper number-41 and through 0.45 μ syringe filter. The resulting solutions were used as test solutions.

Assay % of Standard-solution from Formulations

Both the formulations (Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule) were analyzed to determine the contents of GA, VS, PTS and PP as per method described under chromatographic conditions using RP-HPLC. Every single analysis was repeated three times and results were expressed in percent assay.

Analytical Method Validation

The developed RP-HPLC method was validated as per recommendations given in International Council on Harmonization (ICH), Q2 (R1) for validation of analytical procedure, text and methodology.13–21 The details on parameters and procedure for analytical method validation are as follows.

Specificity

As per ICH, specificity was carried out to make sure the identity of an analyte. Specificity of method was determined by comparing retention time and chromatogram of standards such as GA, VS, PTS and PP with diluent, placebo and sample solutions (Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule).

Linearity

As per ICH guidelines, determination of linearity was performed with minimum 7 concentrations. Linearity was performed by plotting peak area against concentration of standards and finding regression coefficient (R2).

Precision

Precision was performed in terms of system precision, method precision and intermediate precision. In system precision, the sample was analysed for six times using above mentioned procedure. Assay for each analyte was expressed in terms of % RSD. In method precision, sample was analysed for six times using above mentioned procedure. Assay for each analyte was expressed in terms of % RSD. Intermediate precision was performed on different systems, i.e., Waters e2695 Alliance system with a 2996 PDA and 2489 Ultraviolet (UV) detector by different analysts by analysing six different samples of extracts and was expressed in terms of % RSD.

Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

The values of Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) were determined based on the standard deviation of response and slope of calibration graph. The quantitation was done with the help of equations. LOD = 3.3 σ/s; LOQ = 10 σ/s. Where, σ standard deviation of response estimated based on the calibration curve and s is slope of calibration curve.

Accuracy

Accuracy should be reported as percentage recovery by assay of known added amount of analyte in the sample. Accuracy should be assessed using a minimum of 9 determinations over 3 concentration levels covering specified range. In present work, percentage of recovery was calculated by performing recovery studies in triplicates at three different concentration levels viz. 80%, 100%, 120% by adding known number of standard solutions of GA, VS, PTS and PP. These analysed samples and obtained results were compared with expected results.

Robustness

Robustness of an analytical procedure is a measurement of its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variation in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability using normal usage. For assessment of the robustness of developed analytical method following parameters were deliberately changed viz. flow rate, wavelength and column temperature.

RESULTS

The composition of mobile phase in RP-HPLC method was optimized by testing different solvent compositions of varying polarity, column chemistry, column temperature and pH of mobile phase. Significant efforts were taken to obtain maximum results by using present method, which produced highly symmetrical peaks and showed prominent resolution between each standard and formulations. The scanning wavelength of 280 nm was selected to provide comparable results. At this wavelength all analytes showed optimum response. The details are mentioned in Figures 1, 2 and 3.

Figure 1:
Chromatogram of standard solution.

Figure 2:
Chromatogram of Amarantha Gynorite capsule.

Figure 3:
Chromatogram of Amarantha Gynorite syrup.

Specificity Assessment

Specificity of RP-HPLC method was demonstrated by separation of analyte from other potential components such as placebo, diluent and other active constituent of formulation. A volume of 20 μL of potential components was injected and chromatogram was recorded. Peaks of these components were not found at retention time of 4.2 min, 6.8 min, 21.1 min and 23.8 min of GA, VS, PTS and PP; respectively. Hence, present method was considered as specific on specificity parameters. The details are mentioned in Figures 4 and 5.

Figure 4:
Chromatogram of blank.

Figure 5:
Chromatogram of placebo.

Linearity Assessment

The calibrations graph was linear with concentration range of 6-18 μg/mL. The linear regression data for calibration curves, Limit of Detections (LOD) and Limit of Quantifications (LOQ) were presented in Table 4 and Figure 6.

Figure 6:
Linearity graph of GA, VS, PTS and PP.

Sl. No. Parameter Results
Gallic Acid Vasicine Pterostilbene Piperine
1 Linearity Range (μg/mL) 6 -18 6 -18 6 -18 6 -18
2 Correlation coefficient (R2) 0.9996 0.9986 0.9983 0.9966
3 y-intercept 43523 31738 49458 56028
4 Slope 187318 134123 176218 236730
5 LOD 0.3125 0.5759 0.6499 0.9150
6 LOQ 0.9471 1.7450 1.9694 2.7728
Table 4:

Linear regression data for calibrations curve (

n

= 7).

Precision Assessment

A volume of 20 µL of standard solution from 100 µg/mL of stock solution was injected under optimized chromatographic condition to evaluate system suitability, method precision and intermediate precision. An intermediate precision was performed on two different systems. The percentage of Relative Standard Deviation (RSD), USP tailing and plate count were found within acceptance limit. The details are mentioned in Tables 5, 6 and 7.

Sl. No. Name of Standard Retention Time (RT) Mean Peak Area % RSD USP Tailing Plate Count
1 Gallic Acid 4.393 2785223.6 0.78 1.02 25698
2 Vasicine 7.372 2304964.6 0.46 1.16 361032
3 Pterostilbene 21.23 2950334.4 1.06 1.06 541186
4 Piperine 24.49 2542287.6 1.27 1.12 189866
Table 5:

System suitability parameter.
Sl. No. Name of Standard % RSD
1 Gallic Acid 0.524
2 Vasicine 1.121
3 Pterostilbene 0.645
4 Piperine 1.159
Table 6:

Method precision parameter.
Sl. No. Name of Standard % RSD for System-1 % RSD for System-2 Overall % RSD
1 Gallic Acid 0.524 1.471 1.002
2 Vasicine 1.121 0.964 1.042
3 Pterostilbene 0.645 1.596 1.105
4 Piperine 1.159 0.982 1.071
Table 7:

Intermediate precision parameter.

Repeatability Assessment

The repeatability of proposed method was ascertained by injecting five replicates of 100 μg/mL concentration and calculating peak area by proposed RP-HPLC method. From this peak area % RSD was calculated. The details are mentioned in Table 8.

Sl. No. Concentration Peak Area of Standard Solutions
GA VS PTS PP
1 100 2795852 2309238 2957946 2559864
2   2796556 2292583 2895912 2546379
3   2789514 2315689 2956128 2491567
4   2797215 2312745 2966452 2535816
5   2746981 2294568 2975234 2577812
Mean   2785223.6 2304964.6 2950334.4 2542287.6
SD   21599.10 10667.74 31357.08 32411.85
% RSD   0.78 0.48 1.06 1.27
Table 8:

Repeatability of standard solution.

Accuracy Assessment

The accuracy study was carried out by spiking known number of standards into placebo solution at 80%, 100% and 120% of working concentration, respectively. The overall recovery percent were calculated. The details are mentioned in Table 9.

Standard Solutions Recovery Level Peak Area % Recovery Average % Recovery Overall Recovery
Gallic Acid 80% – 01 153264 99.24 99.67 100.16
  80% – 02 154156 99.57  
  80% – 03 154925 100.20  
  100% – 01 254834 100.12 100.68
  100% – 02 256891 100.57  
  100% – 03 254326 101.37  
  120% – 01 339726 100.36 100.12
  120% – 02 337451 100.14  
  120% – 03 335423 99.54  
Vasicine 80% – 01 116375 101.03 100.54 100.44
  80% – 02 115253 98.76  
  80% – 03 118851 101.84  
  100% – 01 182530 100.77 99.07
  100% – 02 182651 101.85  
  100% – 03 182856 100.95  
  120% – 01 258815 101.28 101.72
  120% – 02 258752 102.10  
  120% – 03 257926 101.78  
Pterostilbene 80% – 01 221623 101.91 101.40 100.69
  80% – 02 219834 101.19  
  80% – 03 219681 101.12  
  100% – 01 319869 101.74 101.34
  100% – 02 321968 100.400  
  100% – 03 323981 101.89  
  120% – 01 421888 98.38 99.35
  120% – 02 424172 99.74  
  120% – 03 424932 99.92  
Piperine 80% – 01 230823 99.89 100.56 101.03
  80% – 02 235870 100.93  
  80% – 03 237447 100.87  
  100% – 01 304171 101.80 101.35
  100% – 02 304473 100.94  
  100% – 03 302701 101.32  
  120% – 01 441351 101.88 101.10
  120% – 02 431293 99.56  
  120% – 03 441279 101.87  
Table 9:

Accuracy Recovery Study.

Robustness Assessment

The robustness of RP-HPLC method was evaluated by analyzing the system suitability parameters by varying flow Rate (±2%), detection wavelength (±2%) and column temperature flow rate (± 2%) and wavelength (±5%). By alteration of these parameters, no change was observed in % RSD of peak area. The change in the retention time was found to be significant. The details are given in Table 10.

Standard Solutions Parameter condition RT Mean Area SD % RSD Average % RSD
Gallic acid Flow Rate (± 0.2)
  0.3 mL/min 5.53 2315946 9365.75 0.39 0.80
  0.5 mL/min 4.42 2285871 12128.27 0.52
  0.7 mL/min 3.85 2333997 50555.8 1.47
  Detection Wavelength (± 2.0 nm)
  278 nm 4.61 2395871 26632.26 1.11 0.79
  280 nm 4.42 2285871 12128.27 0.52
  282 nm 4.59 2362428 16843 0.71
  Column Temperature (± 5.0°C)
  20°C 4.60 2151774 31319.2 1.45 0.95
  25°C 4.42 2285871 12128.27 0.52
  30°C 4.387 2142126 18762.11 0.87
Vasicine Flow Rate (± 0.2)
  0.3 mL/min 8.85 1219238 13664.92 1.12 0.78
  0.5 mL/min 7.37 1238759 6785.26 0.55
  0.7 mL/min 5.99 1215711 11729.21 0.69
  Detection Wavelength (± 2.0 nm)
  278 nm 7.21 1248768 15346.96 1.23 0.89
  280 nm 7.37 1238759 6785.26 0.55
  282 nm 7.14 1233708 11234.36 0.91
  Column Temperature (± 5.0°C)
  20°C 7.215 1128597 18297.73 1.62 1.23
  25°C 7.37 1238759 6785.26 0.55
  30°C 7.14 1177325 17804.28 1.51
Pterostilbene Flow Rate (± 0.2)
  0.3 mL/min 27.71 2052411 12611.14 0.61 1.15
  0.5 mL/min 21.23 1984869 24979.75 1.25
  0.7 mL/min 19.68 1962876 31329.55 1.59
  Detection Wavelength (± 2.0 nm)
  278 nm 22.63 1974435 31794.35 1.61 1.32
  280 nm 21.23 1984869 24979.75 1.25
  282 nm 21.97 1974917 22004.62 1.11
  Column Temperature (± 5.0)
  20°C 21.38 1872245 18345.22 0.98 0.98
  25°C 21.23 1984869 24979.75 1.25
  30°C 20.70 1906682 13612.2 0.71
Piperine Flow Rate (± 0.2)
  0.3 mL/min 31.75 2553685 29619.92 1.15 1.05
  0.5 mL/min 24.49 2541818 25934.82 1.02
  0.7 mL/min 22.34 2532589 24889.49 0.98
  Detection Wavelength (± 2.0nm)
  278 nm 25.82 2538589 26285.9 1.03 0.97
  280 nm 24.49 2541818 25934.82 1.02
  282 nm 25.04 2567650 22432.97 0.87
Column Temperature (± 5.0)
20°C 25.17 2452065 38719.79 1.58 1.39
25°C 24.49 2541818 25934.82 1.02
30°C 24.32 2452065 38719.79 1.57
Table 10:

Robustness Assessment.

DISCUSSION

Market is flooded with Ayurvedic proprietary medicines indicated for menstrual irregularities/PCOS. These Ayurvedic medicines are available in various dosage forms such as tablet, capsule, granules, syrup, and many others. Among these dosage forms, syrup-based formulations are being preferred by consumers. Most of these Ayurvedic syrup formulations are prepared using crude herbs. During manufacturing process, only water-soluble components of crude herbs are available, whereas those components which are not soluble in water will not be available in the final formulation. This may impact efficacy of the product.

In order to make a comprehensive formulation, Amarantha Gynorite Syrup and Amarantha Gynorite Capsule are prepared using standardized herbal extracts. Standardization of polyherbal Ayurvedic medicines has become very essential as it makes sure about the quality of product; broadly it covers qualitative and quantitative part of analysis13–21. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of polyherbal formulation is extremely intricate and it also involves lots of time, and various resources including infrastructure, man power, consumables, etc. Through this research, a single RP-HPLC method which is simple, cost and time effective for analysis of various marker compounds including Gallic Acid (GA), Vasicine (VS), Pterostilbene (PTS) and Piperine (PP) from Amarantha Gynorite Syrup and Amarantha Gynorite Capsule is developed.

The individual standards and samples were run in different mobile phases. From different mobile phases optimized mobile phase was chosen with detection absorbance 280 nm. A satisfactory separation and usual resolutions peak were observed at optimized conditions and at detection wavelength 280 nm. Finally, a cost-efficient RP-HPLC method was developed with less time requirement for simultaneous separation and determination of GA, VS, PTS and PP. This new isocratic RP-HPLC was found to be economical, simple, precise, accurate and reproducible. It was suitable for qualitative and quantitative analysis of GA, VS, PTS and PP.

The injection volume 20 µL was loaded for quantitative analysis and to ensure quality and safety of formulations. The retention time was found to be 4.40 min for GA, 7.37 min for VS, 21.23 min for PTS and 24.98 min for PP. The optimized method was validated as per ICH guidelines. In specificity studies, no interference peak was observed in placebo, blank and both the formulations. Linearity for range of 6-18 μg/mL with correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9996, 0.9986, 0.9983 and 0.9966 for GA, VS, PTS and PP, respectively. Precision of proposed RP-HPLC method was carried out in terms of system suitability studies, method precision, intermediate precision and repeatability. The % RSD was found to be within the acceptance criteria i.e., < 2.0%.

During accuracy recovery studies, the overall recovery percent were found to be 100.16% for GA, 100.44% for VS, 100.69% for PTS and 101.03% for PP; respectively. The LOD, LOQ values were found to be 0.3125 µg/mL and 0.9471 µg/mL for GA; 0.5759 µg/mL and 1.7450 µg/mL for VS, 0.6499 µg/mL and 1.9694 µg/mL for PTS, and 0.9150 µg/mL and 2.772 µg/mL for PP; respectively.

The method was found to be robust with deliberate change of ±2% in flow rate, wavelength, and column temperature.

The quantity of GA, VS, PTS and PP were found to be 0.45% and 0.36%, 1.45% and 0.76%, 2.70% and 2.40% and 0.31% and 0.09% in Amarantha Gynorite syrup and Amarantha Gynorite capsule, respectively. Absence of interference peak at respective retention time indicated that the developed method can be used for routine analysis for both the Ayurvedic proprietary formulations. During the study, low cost, faster analysis, satisfactory precision, accuracy and robustness were the main features of RP-HPLC method.

CONCLUSION

A novel, isocratic RP-HPLC method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of various marker compounds including GA, VS, PTS and PP from Amarantha Gynorite Syrup and Amarantha Gynorite Capsule was developed. The method is economical, simple, precise, accurate and reproducible.

References

  1. Susan S.. Importance and effectiveness of herbal medicines. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2019;8(2):354-7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Heredia D, Green I, Klaasen J, Rahiman F.. Importance and relevance of phytochemicals present in . Array. 2022;2022:5793436 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  3. Agrawal P, Vegda R, Laddha K.. Simultaneous estimation of withaferin A and Z-guggulsterone in marketed formulation by RP-HPLC. J Chromatogr Sci. 2015;53(6):940-4. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  4. Amruta BL, Varghese E, Kulkarni P.. Menstrual health and . Int Ayurvedic J.. 2016;4(4):602-5. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  5. Katole UM, Ovar DD, Shinde MM, Deshmukh GS. Ayurveda view on common menstrual disorders, causes, symptoms and management. World J Pharm Res.. 2021;7(10):246-8. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  6. Vidyasagar GM, Prashantkumar P.. Traditional herbal remedies for gynecological disorders in women of Bidar district, Karnataka, India. Fitoterapia. 2007;78(1):48-51. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  7. Kahkeshani N, Farzaei F, Fotouhi M, Alavi SS, Bahramsoltani R, Naseri R, et al. Pharmacological effects of gallic acid in health and diseases: a mechanistic review. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(3):225-37. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  8. Rachana R, Basu S, Pant M, Kumar MP, Saluja S. Review and future perspectives of using vasicine, and related compounds. Indo Glob J Pharm Sci.. 2011;1(1):85-98. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  9. Nagarajan S, Mohandas S, Ganesan K, Xu B, Ramkumar KM. New insights into dietary Pterostilbene: sources, metabolism, and health promotion effects. Molecules.. 2022;27(19):6316 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  10. Vasavirama K, Upender M.. Piperine: a valuable alkaloid from piper species. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6(4):34-8. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang H, Wang C, Li X, Zhang Y. Effects of pterostilbene on treating hyperprolactinemia and related mechanisms. Am J Transl Res.. 2016;8(7):3049-55. [PubMed] | [Google Scholar]
  12. Chopra B, Dhingra AK, Kapoor RP, Prasad DN. Piperine and its various physicochemical and biological aspects: a review. Open Chem;J. 2016(3):75-96. [PubMed] | [Google Scholar]
  13. Ögenler O, n İ, Uzel İ. Medical plants used for treatment of gynecological disorders in Ottomans in the 15th century. J Complement Med Res.. 2018;7(2):171-7. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  14. Vaidya VN, Tatiya AU, Elango A, Kukkupuni SK, Vishnuprasad CN. Need for comprehensive standardization strategies for marketed formulations. J Ayurveda Integr Med.. 2018;9(4):312-5. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  15. Balekundri A, Mannur V.. Quality control of the traditional herbs and herbal products: a review. Future J Pharm Sci. 2020;6(1):67 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  16. . Validation Anal Proc Text Methodol Curr Step 4 versions. 2005;Q2:(R1) [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  17. Kshirsagar RR, Vaidya SA, Jain V. Development and validation of a novel RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous quantification of ascorbic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, piperine, and thymol in a polyherbal formulation. Indian J Nat Prod Resour.. 2020;11(4):307-11. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  18. Annapurna MM, Venkatesh B, Teja GR. Development of a validated stability indicating liquid chromatographic method for the determination of pterostilbene. Indian J Pharm Educ Res.. 2018;52(4s):s63-70. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  19. Kurangi B, Jalalpure S.. A validated stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for piperine estimation in black pepper, marketed formulation and nanoparticles. Indian J Pharm Educ Res.. 2020;54(3s):s677-86. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernandes FHA, Batista RSA, de Medeiros FD, Santos FS, Medeiros ACD. Development of a rapid and simple HPLC-UV method for determination of gallic acid in . Rev Bras Farmacognosia. 2015;25(3):208-11. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
  21. Singh MP, Gupta A, Singh S.. Qualitative analysis of gallic acid by HPLC method in different extracts of roxb fruit qualitative analysis of gallic acid by HPLC method in different extracts of roxb fruit. Fabad J Pharm Sci.. 2019;44(2):101-6. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
Original Article
Previous ArticlePreparation and Characterization of Mucoadhesive Proniosomal Gel of Curcumin with Thiolated Chitosan for the Treatment of Oral Mucositis
Next Article Investigation of Phytochemical Profile of Ethanolic Extract of Elaeocarpus ganitrus and Desmostachya bipinnata

Related Posts

Past Work Done on the Matrix Tablets: A Quick Reference for the Research Beginner in Sustained-release Dosage Forms

July 21, 2023

Overview on Evolving Variants of Novel Coronavirus and Control Measures in India

July 21, 2023

An Overview of the Various Appropriate Types of Cell Lines for the Production of Monoclonal Antibodies

July 21, 2023
Download PDF
Cite this Article
Citation Output

Read in Readcube
  • Download PDF
  • ReadCube
Citations & Metrics
Article Metrics
  • Dimensions Metrics
  • Page Views
  • Related
Total Views 0
Last Month Views 0
Click for PLUM.MX Metrics Search this article in Google Scholar Related Articles in Google Scholar Search related in PUBMED


Contents
  • ABSTRACT
  • INTRODUCTION
  • MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • RESULTS
  • DISCUSSION
  • CONCLUSION
  • References
About
About

publishing peer-reviewed scholarly reviews, themed issues and research articles within the entire scope of the Pharmaceutical field. The journal particularly aims to foster the dissemination of scientific information by publishing manuscripts related to Pharmacy and Related Fields.

We're accepting new submissions right now.

Facebook Twitter RSS
Editor Picks

Overview on Evolving Variants of Novel Coronavirus and Control Measures in India

July 5, 2023

An Overview of the Various Appropriate Types of Cell Lines for the Production of Monoclonal Antibodies

July 5, 2023

Ashwagandha: A Flagship Herb of Ayurveda from Past to Present Nano Era

July 5, 2023

Dental Pulp Stem Cells: Biology and Promise for Regenerative Medicine

July 5, 2023
STAY CONNECTED

Contact Editor-In-Chief
Editor, International Journal of Pharm Investigation
#9, Vinnse Tower, Wheeler Road Extn.
St. Thomas Town, 560084, Bangalore, INDIA
Email: editor@jpionline.org

© 2023 Phcog.Net | Published by : EManuscript.
  • Home
  • Submit Article
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.