Contents
ABSTRACT
Background
The most popular and well-designed nano-carriers for drug delivery targeting are liposomes. In order to overcome barriers to cellular and tissue uptake and increase medication bio-distribution to target areas in vivo, they have improved medicines for a variety of biomedical applications.
Objectives
The diffusion method is used to release the medication from liposomes. The major goals of this medication delivery system were to increase contact resistance duration in the eye and bioavailability.
Materials and Methods
Liposomes were effectively produced by reverse phase evaporation technique and their shape, particle size, drug entrapment efficiency and content were examined. Liposomes were prepared by using drug, egg lecithin, chloroform, and diethyl ether.
Results
This dosage form bears considerable promise for drug release, according to in vitro experiments. As a result, the design of the liposomes revealed virtually spherical vesicles. Up to 88.9% and 92.1%, respectively, of the EE% and DC% were possible. Studies on medication release from liposomes in vitro demonstrate that an increase in lipid concentration delays drug release.
Conclusion
The drug is known as dorzolamide in accordance with the conclusions of the investigations stated above. The medicine is stable in all pH, it was found after the Preformulation experiment was over. The dorzolamide curve was calibrated in analytical experiments using phosphate buffers with pH values of 5.6, 7.4 and 6.8. As a result of the inquiry, it was established that the standard plot may be used in additional analytical studies. Liposome batches show that integration efficiency rose with increasing polymer content. The manufactured liposomes’ surface was examined using scanner electron microscopy.
INTRODUCTION
Ophthalmic formulations are sterile in dosage, free of foreign material, and appropriately designed in a form that can be administered to the inner side (intraocular) or the cavity of the eye, or they can be used in conjunction with an ophthalmic treatment device.1 The eye is a special and vital organ. Since the ocular route is equivalent to other routes and has a particular anatomy that can prevent drug absorption into the deep tissues of the eye, drug delivery by this channel is a very delicate task for researchers. There are many different drug delivery methods for ophthalmic usage, including eye drops, ointments, lotions and suspensions for the eyes, however, these preparations and formulations must be used with caution. Due to their solubility in tears, previously made ophthalmic dose have the potential to lose their viscosity and resistance time in the eye. This issue can be resolved by creating a medication formulation that instantly forms in situ gel when injected into the eye cavity. In situ gels were created to extend the medication’s stay in the eye cavity, improve drug resistance and bioavailability and relieve the eye from repeated doses.2,3 The delivery methods must preserve certain properties, such as sterility, isotonicity and improved penetration from the eye muscle, in order to control the drug’s use in the ocular cavity. Less soluble in tears, less protein binding a simple installation and uninstall process, good rheological characteristics and formulation resistance in the ocular cavity4–6 Mainly The medication is absorbed into the ocular system through the cornea, which is more efficiently than other routes like scleral and Maidenhead pericardium absorption, through which the blood vessel can absorb the drug from the absorption route and finally, general solution of the drug happens in the body. To regulate the drug’s use in the ocular cavity, the delivery techniques must maintain specific qualities such as sterility, isotonicity and enhanced penetration from the eye muscle.7–10 Less protein binding, less solubility in tears, ease of installation and removal, good rheological properties and formulation resistance in the ocular cavity. Mainly The drug is absorbed into the ocular system through the cornea, which is more effective than other routes like scleral and Maidenhead pericardium absorption. Afterwards, the drug is generally dissolved in the body.10–11
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Dorzolamide Hydrochloride was procured from Century Pharmaceutical Limited. Natural Egg Phospholipid Powder was procured from Vitae Gen Life Sciences, Nagpur. Chitosan was procured from Bangalore Fine Chemicals, Bengaluru, Karnataka.
Method for preparation of liposomes
Liposomes containing the drug were prepared by Reverse phase evaporation technique and the prepared liposomes were then dissolved in a solution containing gelling agents. Different formulations (Formulation F1-F9) of Dorzolamide liposome prepared from different polymers with varying concentration as shown in Table 1.
Sl. No. | Ingredients | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dorzolamide Hydrochloride (mg) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
2. | Egg lecithin | 100 | 100 | 150 | 150 | 200 | 250 | 300 | 400 | 500 |
3. | Chitosan | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 15 |
4. | Diethyl ether | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
5. | Ethanol | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
6. | Chloroform | 10 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
7. | Gellan Gum (mg) | 0.5 | 0.7 | —– | 0.5 | 0.7 | ——- | 0.5 | 0.7 | —— |
8. | Sodium Alginate(mg) | ——- | —— | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | —— | 0.3 | 0.3 | —— |
9 | Poloxamer188 (mg) | ——- | ——- | —– | ——- | ——- | 18 | ——- | ——- | 25 |
11 | Poloxamer407 (mg) | ——- | —— | —— | —— | —— | —– | 18 | 25 | —– |
12 | HPMC | ——- | —— | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | —– |
13 | Methyl cellulose | —– | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | —— | —— | —— | 0.5 | —— |
14 | Buffer solution pH 7.4 (mL) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | —— | —— | —— | —— |
15 | Buffer solution pH 6.5 (mL) | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 100 | 100 | —— | —— |
16 | Buffer solution pH 4.7 (mL) | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 100 | 100 |
Evaluation of ocular gel
Physical characteristics
It is important to look into the physical qualities of the prepared formulation. Phase separation, colour, homogeneity and consistency are examined.
FTIR Analysis
FTIR was performed for the conformation of the original drug, polymer and to know polymer and drug interaction. In this test, the sample was weighed and mixed with KBr and placed under a pressure of 100 kg/cm to get pallets. FTIR analysis of the drug (dorzolamide), polymers (chitosan, egg lecithin), and physical mixture of drug-polymer and pellets were recorded. IR Spectra of a) dorzolamide sample b) Egg lecithin c) Physical mixture of drug and polymer d) Chitosan shown in Figure 1.
Preparation of standard curve of dorzolamide hydrochloride in phosphate buffer pH 7.4: The different concentration of drug Dorzolamide 2-12 μg/ml was prepared. Then absorbance of each concentration at λmax 253nm was taken using phosphate buffer ph 7.4 as diluent and the slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient were calculated (Figure 2). Absorbance was taken in triplicate for all the concentration and calculated the standard deviation which is shown in Table 2.
Concentration (μg/mL) | Absorbance (298 nm) |
---|---|
0 | 0.00 |
2 | 0.23 |
4 | 0.47 |
6 | 0.67 |
8 | 0.82 |
10 | 1.11 |
pH determination
The pH of the gel is determined using a pH meter. The procedure involved sticking the electrode tip into the gel and 2 min later, the outcome was recorded. Results of pH for different formulation (F1 to F9) mentioned in Table 3.
Formulation | pH | Spreadability (in cm) | Centrifugation | Viscosity in cps. (Centipoise) |
---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | 6.80 ± 0.09 | 7.31±0.03 | No separation | 21,455 ± 1.6 |
F2 | 6.41 ± 0.04 | 8.2±0.06 | No separation | 24,576 ± 1.7 |
F3 | 6.91 ± 0.03 | 6.7±0.03 | No separation | 19,456 ± 1.2 |
F4 | 6.75 ± 0.06 | 7.6±0.03 | No separation | 22,746 ± 1.3 |
F5 | 6.32 ± 0.08 | 7.9±0.01 | No separation | 21,776 ± 1.4 |
F6 | 6.72 ± 0.03 | 6.8±0.03 | No separation | 19,976 ± 1.5 |
F7 | 6.73 ± 0.05 | 7.8±0.02 | No separation | 23,456 ± 1.7 |
F8 | 6.52 ± 0.04 | 8.3±0.03 | No separation | 21,786 ± 1.3 |
F9 | 6.81 ± 0.06 | 7.1±0.03 | No separation | 19,786 ± 1.4 |
Rheological research
The viscosity of the produced formulation is measured using a Brookfield viscometer (Brookfield LV, spindle 64). The spindle of the viscometer was allowed to rotate at predetermined rates (100 rpm) while the gel sample was placed within a glass container. The viscosity results are shown in below Table 3.12–15
Spreadability and Centrifugation
All the prepared liposomal formulation were evaluated for Spreadability and checked for layer separation by the method of centrifugation. The outcomes shown in Table 3.
Size of the vesicles
Swelling index
To test the swelling of ocular gel containing Dorzolamide hydrochloride liposomal formulations as shown in Figure 8, three set of each formulation were weighed and put in a mesh basket and inserted into phosphate buffer saline (PBS) of pH 7.4 maintained at temperature 32 ± 0.5°C at different time intervals (1 hour, 2 hour, 3 hour, 4 hour and 5 hour). The swollen formulation than removed, wiped with lint free tissue to remove excess surface PBS, weighed, and then return back to the same container.
Swelling index was calculated using the following equation:
Where W0 is the initial weight of the sample and Wt is its weight at time t. Results of swelling index for formulated liposomes (F1 to F9) summarized in Table 4 and comparative chart of time v/s swelling index of different formulation (F1 to F9) shown in Figure 4.
Formulation | 1st hr | 2nd hr | 3rd hr | 4th hr | 5th hr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | ±25-0.01% | ±37-0.02% | ±49-0.01% | ±56.5-0.02% | ±69.3-0.01% |
F2 | ±23.2-0.02% | ±34.3-0.01% | ±43.7-0.02% | ±54.1-0.01% | ±64.4–0.02% |
F3 | ±20.6-0.01% | ±29.6-0.03% | ±31.9-0.02% | ±53.6-0.02% | ±63.7-0.01% |
F4 | ±27-0.03% | ±39-0.02% | ±50.2-0.01% | ±57.3-0.04% | ±68.1-0.02% |
F5 | ±22.9-0.03% | ±35.4-0.04% | ±44.1-0.02% | ±54.9-0.03% | ±65.3-0.01% |
F6 | ±21.5-0.02% | ±28.7-0.02% | ±40.1-0.02% | ±52.1-0.02% | ±62.9-0.02% |
F7 | ±27.5-0.01% | ±40-0.01% | ±51.5-0.02% | ±58.1-0.01% | ±69.5-0.01% |
F8 | ±23.4-0.02% | ±36.3-0.02% | ±43.5-0.03% | ±53.2-0.02% | ±65.9-0.02% |
F9 | ±20.1-0.02% | ±27.6-0.01% | ±42.1-0.03% | ±53.9-0.02% | ±63.6-0.02% |
Polydispersity index and Zeta potential:
The size and polydispersity index of the different liposomes were obtained from DLS measurements by using a Zeta sizer nano ZS Malvern Instrument. Samples were illuminated with a laser at a fixed detection arrangement of 90° to the center of the cell area and fluctuations in the intensities of the scattered light were analysed. Polydispersity index of formulation F5 shown in Figure 5 and zeta potential of formulation F5 shown in Figure 6.
Drug content determination
In vitro Release Study
A Franz diffusion cell is used to perform drug release studies. 200 mg of emulgel is evenly distributed across the surface of the egg membrane. Both the chambers of the diffusion cell are sandwiched together by the egg membrane. To solubilize the medication, newly made PBS solution (pH 5.5) is poured into the receptor chamber. The receptor chamber is stirred using a magnetic stirrer. The samples are taken in 1.0 mL aliquots at predetermined intervals. After the proper dilutions, samples are examined using a UV-visible Spectrophotometer to determine their drug content. Cumulative adjustments are made to establish the overall amount of medication released at each time period. The total amount of medication delivered through the egg membrane is then calculated as a function of time.18–22 Their drug content. Cumulative adjustments are made to establish the overall amount of medication released at each time period. Results of in-vitro drug release summarized in Table 5 and cumulative drug release of dorzolamide hydrochloride from in-situ ocular gel of different formulation (Formulation F1 to F9) shown in Figure 9.
Time in min | % Cumulative drug release | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | |
1 | 12.9% | 9.0% | 8.92% | 12.70% | 13.9% | 13.11% | 9.6% | 14.72% | 13.4% |
30 | 22.25% | 20.15% | 13.38% | 25.22% | 25.65% | 33.33% | 31.69% | 24.44% | 26.39% |
45 | 24.76% | 29.31% | 32.45% | 39.96% | 38.91% | 43.91% | 43.32% | 38.53% | 38.04% |
60 | 35.39% | 35.50% | 45.85% | 48.37% | 60.84% | 50.66% | 53.65% | 50.85% | 46.64%s |
75 | 47.91% | 44.56% | 54.68% | 63.66% | 79.39% | 62.06% | 65.89% | 62.35% | 58.89% |
90 | 67.57% | 53.59% | 65.31% | 73.87% | 86.98% | 70.02% | 79.10% | 74.88% | 74.35% |
105 | 81.46% | 68.83% | 82.06% | 87.03% | 95.35% | 78.72% | 87.50% | 78.39% | 77.85% |
120 | 93.74% | 78.90% | 94.02% | 98.21% | 98.93% | 85.09% | 94.14% | 82.66% | 81.18% |
RESULTS
Melting point
It was found that the melting point of dorzolamide was 284.4°C.
Analysis of FTIR Spectroscopy
In an IR study, it was discovered that the sample’s peaks and the dorzolamide reference spectra from IP had similar peak heights. Similar wavenumber range peaks are visible in the scan as in the reference spectra. It was therefore expected that the sample would be found to be pure dorzolamide and suitable for use in further research.22–25
Evaluation of liposomes
Kinetic drug release study for F1 to F 9 formulation.
CONCLUSION
In this study, the potential of liposomes as a drug vehicle for the ophthalmic delivery of dorzolamide was investigated. Nine liposomal formulations have been designed and optimized. Physical characterization revealed that liposomes embedded in situ ocular gel are suitable for ocular administration, with an encapsulation efficiency of 90%. The formulations stored at +4°C were stable for two months and greater chemical stability was obtained with the HA coating. Liposomes guarantee a prolonged and gradual release and they improve the residence time of the drug into the eye and also enhance the bioavailability of the drug by enhancing the corneal penetration of the drug.
Finally, the in vitro uptake study, conducted with fluorescent liposomes, showed that liposomal formulations increased the absorption at the cellular level and, in particular, at nucleus level, when tested in the corneal and conjunctival cells, with the most marked effect for HA-coated liposomes.
Cite this article:
Rawat M, Gnanarajan G. Advancement and in vitro Characterization of an Ocular Gel Containing Chitosomal Encapsulated Drug for Glaucoma Therapy. Int. J. Pharm. Investigation. 2024;14(3):946-58.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank whole faculty members and management of SGRRU (School of Pharmaceutical Sciences), Patel Nagar, Dehradun- 248001 for providing all necessary technical support and motivating us at every stage.
ABBREVIATIONS
% | Percentage |
---|---|
EE% | Percentage entrapment efficiency |
DC% | Percent Drug Content |
μg | Microgram |
ml | Milli litre |
nm | Nanometer |
FTIR | Fourier Transform Infra-red |
Kg | Kilogram |
cm | Centimeter |
IR | Infra red |
rpm | Revolution per minunte |
SEM | Scanning electron microscopy |
TEM | Transmission electron microscopy |
PBS | Phosphate buffer saline |
°C | Degree Celsius |
v/s | Versus |
UV | Ultra violet |
g | Gram |
μ | Micron |
hr | Hour |
References
- Sabry HS, Al-Shohani AD, Mahmood SZ. Formulation and evaluation of levofloxacin and betamethasone ophthalmic Emulgel. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(2):205-11. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nair AB, Shah J, Jacob S, Al-Dhubiab BE, Srecharsha N, Morsy MA, et al. Experimental design, formulation and evaluation of a novel topical gel system to treat ocular infections. loS one. 2021;16(3):1-18. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Prasanth VV, Ranjan S. Formulation and evaluation of ocular gel ofloxacin. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2017;7(5):68-73. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Pujitha C, Jyothi JS, Sucharitha J, Lakshmi GN, Rao AL. Formulation and characterization of ofloxacin ophthalmic gel. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol. 2017;4(2):105 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Ashara K, Soniwala MM, Emulgel KS. A novel drug delivery system [Ashara K, Soniwala M, Shah K, J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2016. Emulgel. A novel drug delivery system. J Pak Assoc. 2017;29(26(3)):244-49. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Makwana JSB, Patel VA, Parmar SJ. Development and characterization of gel for ophthalmic formulation containing ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. Results Pharm Sci. 2016;1(6):1-6. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Gadad AP, Wadklar PD, Dandghi P, Patil A. Thermosensitive gel for ocular delivery of lomefloxacin. Indian J Pharm Educ Res. 2016;150(2):96-105. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y, Ling X, Jiang W, Du S, Lu Y, Tu J, et al. Formulation and evaluation of cyclosporin A emulgel for ocular delivery. Drug Deliv. 2015;22(7):911-7. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Mulye SP, Wadka KA, Manish SS. Kondawar Formulation development and evaluation of indomethacin emulgel. Pharm Sin. 2013;4(5):31-45. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nagesh C, Venkatesh JS, Raj SM, Rabadia J, Patil S, Shankraiah M, et al. Intragastric floating drug delivery system of levofloxacin Formulation and Evaluation. J Pharm Res. 2011;3(6):1265-72. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Bhavanam PR, Lekkala VK, Maddirala P, Reddy SN, Krishna AS, Rajesh CH, et al. Formulation and evaluation of levofloxacin using different types and concentrations of superdisintregrants. Res. J Pharm Res. 2010;2(5):308-12. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Kumar D, Singh J, Antil M, Kumar V. Emulgel-novel topical drug delivery system-a comprehensive review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7(12):4733 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Panwar A, Upadhyay N, Bairagi M, Gujar S, Darwhekar G, Jain D, et al. Emulgel: a review. Asian J Pharm Life Sci. 2011;2231:45 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Shehata TM, Shehata TM, Nair AB, Al-Dhubiab BE, Shah J, Jacob S, Alhaider IA, et al. Vesicular emulgel based system for transdermal delivery of insulin: factorial design and evaluation. Appl Sci. 2020;10(15):5341-56. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Ali Khan BA, Ullah S, Khan MK, Alshahrani SM, Braga VA. Formulation and evaluation of -based emulgel for wound healing using an animal model. Saudi Pharm J. 2020;28(12):1842-50. [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Burki IK, Khan MK, Khan BA, Uzair B, Braga VA, Jamil QA, et al. Formulation development, characterization and evaluation of a novel dexibuprofen-capsaicin skin emulgel with improved anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020;21(6):211 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nour El-Din HT, Elhosseiny NM, El-Gendy MA, Mahmoud AA, Hussein MM, Attia AS, et al. A rapid lysostaphin production approach and a convenient novel lysostaphin loaded nanoemulgel; As a sustainable low-cost methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus combating platform. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):435 [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Khan J, Norfarhani S, Sahu RK, Ruhi S, Kaleemullah M, Al-Dhalli S, et al. Yusuf E. and Evaluation of topical Emulgel of Aspirin using different Polymeric Bases. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020;13(12):6300-4. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Siddiqui B, Rehman AU, Haq IU, Ahmad NM, Ahmed N. Development, optimization and evaluation of nano encapsulated diacerein emulgel for potential use in osteoarthritis. J Microencapsul. 2020;37(8):595-608. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Torregrosa A, Ochoa-Andrade AT, Parente ME, Vidarte A, Guarinoni G, Savio E, et al. Development of an emulgel for the treatment of rosacea using quality by design approach. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2020;46(2):296-308. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Daihom BA, Bendas ER, Mohamed MI, Badawi AA. Development and evaluation of domperidone/Dowex resinate embedded gastro-floatable emulgel and effervescent alginate beads. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;59:101941 [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Jagdale SC, Kothekar PV. Development of emulgel delivery of Mupirocin for treatment of skin infection. Recent Pat Anti-Infect Drug Discov. 2020;15(2):137-56. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Nordholm-Carstensen A, Perregaard H, Wahlstrøm KL, Hagen KB, Hougaard HT, Krarup PM, et al. Treatment of chronic anal fissure: a feasibility study on Levorag® Emulgel versus diltiazem gel 2%. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(4):615-21. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Noronha LL, Ferreira PGGS, Lima C, Borba-Santos LP, Rozental S, de Moraes M, et al. Formulation and evaluation of a novel itraconazole-clotrimazole topical emulgel for the treatment of sporotrichosis. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(14):1566-70. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]
- Maharjan P, Hyung K, Anjila C, Meong M, Shin C, Moon C, et al. pharmaceutical challenges and perspectives in developing ophthalmic drug formulations. J Pharm Investig. 2018;49:215-28. [PubMed] | [CrossRef] | [Google Scholar]