ABSTRACT
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs) are exciting technology in cancer therapy that represents agents with a unique combination of super paramagnetism, biocompatibility and the capability for surface functionalization toward targeted applications. The following review describes the current innovations and various applications of IONPs against cancer, dealing with their roles in targeted drug delivery, hyperthermia and imaging. IONPs can be synthesized by various chemical and physical methods, for instance, co-precipitation or thermal decomposition. Characterization techniques for their structural and magnetic properties include transmission electron microscopy and vibrating sample magnetometry. IONPs allow for targeted drug delivery by the release of therapeutic agents at a specific location, reducing systemic toxicity. In magnetic hyperthermia applications, they exploit the ability to produce heat during the alternating magnetic field exposure and induce apoptosis in tumor cells. Moreover, IONPs serve as magnetic resonance contrast imaging agents, enhancing tumors’ imaging. Even with the great promise of IONPs, concerns about toxicity and biocompatibility and scalable production methods have yet to be realized. Combination therapies interlacing IONPs with other therapeutic modalities, as well as further research into their elicited immunomodulatory effects, are some of the future perspectives that have been outlined. Taken together, advancements in IONP technology herald a new frontier in cancer therapy, offering innovative strategies to improve treatment efficacy and the lives of patients.
INTRODUCTION
Cancer has a strong influence on the health of the world’s population and is responsible for leading the statistics of death acquired from non-communicable diseases. According to the WHO, almost 10 million cancer-related deaths occurred in 2020, thereby attaching a critical impact on public health (Cancer, 2024). The genetic disease is mainly a result of an accumulation of genetic mutations that leads to the formation of cells having an unstable genome and an increased proliferation rate, hence leading to the formation of a tumor growing in an invasive manner into the tissues of the host (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Established cancer treatment modalities include surgical, chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic procedures. However, a patient’s individual needs may not accord with such treatment approaches because these are organ-based subtypes of cancer cells that can display different characteristics. This creates diagnosis and treatment strategies that are complex (Wild, 2012). Some conventional therapies may inadvertently select more resistant cancer cell subtypes. As such, treatment resistance and recurrence in some cases cause worse patient outcomes (Cree and Charlton, 2017). Nanotechnology, in this respect, becomes the potential platform for cancer treatment. Some unique physical and chemical properties that can be manipulated at the nanoscale level of 1 to 100 nm could be exploited to provide better therapeutic efficiency with reduced side effects. The nanomaterials can be made multifunctional to permit targeted delivery of drugs and enable improved diagnosis (Boverhofet al., 2015). Nanotechnology does offer a lot of opportunities in biomedicine because it implies very tough requirements regarding purity, biocompatibility and stability. Functionalization will endow nanomaterials with the capacity for therapeutic agents, targeting molecules and diagnostic markers-in other words, sophisticated Nano biomaterials that can respond intelligently to the intricacies of diseases such as cancer. This new way might reshuffle the cards in cancer diagnosis and treatment, leading to possibly more powerful and less harmful therapeutic options in the near future (Janget al., 2016).
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs) have been developed as a potential platform for the treatment of cancer and have some advantages compared to traditional modalities of therapy (Alphandér, 2020). With the superparamagnetic property and capability of versatile surface functionalization, it opened new avenues in targeted drug delivery, hyperthermia treatment and imaging against malignancies. In this respect, the introduction of IONPs into the field of cancer therapy opened new avenues for treating this devastating disease and gave rise to new hopes for more effective and personalized treatment strategies (Xuet al., 2021).
Introduction to Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs) have generated significant interest in recent years, since they exhibit unique physicochemical properties, as well as promising applications in various fields (Baabu et al., 2023). IONPs are defined as sub-nanosized particles composed of iron oxide materials and possess superior properties that make them ideal candidates for applications in biomedicine (e.g., MRI contrast agents, drug delivery vehicles), the environment (e.g., wastewater treatment) and industry. The size- and shape-dependent physical and chemical properties of IONPs primarily stem from their nanoscale dimensions, which provide a high surface area to volume ratio. In addition, other attributes are derived from their controlled morphologies (e.g., spherical or non-spherical shapes-cubic, spindle-shaped spheres that can also be prepared by fine-tuning synthetic approaches such as co-precipitation reaction conditions), resulting in tunable magnetic characteristics and stabilities (Aliet al., 2016).
This property makes them highly useful for applications such as magnetic resonance imaging and hyperthermia treatments in cancer therapy, besides targeted drug delivery. Functionalization on their surface can modulate this magnetic property to a very fine degree. In addition to making the magnetic nanoparticles more stable and biocompatible, such surface modification can provide the requisite cellular/biomolecular targets due to selective interactions. By modifying the surface chemistry, dispersibility of IONPs in biological environments can be increased and their toxicity reduced; therefore, the applicability of IONPs in medical and environmental areas will be expanded (Dadfaret al., 2019).
Surface functionalization of iron oxide nanoparticles is the process where different chemical groups or biomolecules attach to their surface, dramatically affecting their behavior in terms of interaction with biological systems. This technique opens the way for nanoparticle versatility that can be further conjugated with a therapeutic agent, imaging agent, or targeting ligand. The frequently used ways of functionalization involve polymers, silica coatings and biological molecules such as antibodies or peptides (Martinez-Boubetaet al., 2013). The enable them to avoid nonspecific interactions and therefore be more effective in therapeutic applications (Montielet al., 2022). With a special combination of size, shape, magnetic properties and surface functionalization, iron oxide nanoparticles become an extremely flexible tool for nanotechnology development in many fields. The damaging effect on cells is usually explained by the production of reactive oxygen species. Under acidic conditions, formation of such radicals can occur if H2O2 is present and magnetite particles supply Fe2+ ions as Fenton catalysts. Figure 1 shows Overview of the various applications, structural changes and surface interactions of iron oxide nanoparticles at the nanoscale.

Figure 1:
Overview of the various applications, structural changes and surface interactions of iron oxide nanoparticles at the nanoscale.
For biological applications, MNPs must be designed to be both chemically and mechanically inert to achieve high separation capabilities with the appropriate affinities towards biomolecules involved in procedures like protein purification, cell sorting, algae harvesting and virus removal (Marínet al., 2016). Interestingly, MNPs have been approved by FDA for several biomedical applications, among which are the following: hyperthermia treatment, targeted drug delivery and contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (Rothet al., 2016). On the other hand, in catalytic applications like Fenton chemistry, a high reactivity of MNPs is required. While huge research has been done on the modification and functionalization of MNPs, their formation process, phase transitions and nature at the surface are still not fully understood (Thanh, 2012). In this study, a few synthesis pathways have been evaluated for the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles, namely, polyol, hydrothermal (Daouet al., 2006), electrochemical (Ramimoghadamet al., 2014), pyrolytic (Klugeet al., 2015), and co-precipitative methods (Ahnet al., 2012). Different synthesis parameters, like temperature, pH and concentration of iron ions, have been changed to determine their effects on the size, morphology and composition of iron oxide nanoparticles (Bateeret al., 2013; Limet al., 2016; Forgeet al., 2008), The control of surface reactivity is very critical, which can be altered by different ions, biomolecules, or polymers and impact particles’ performance. In the case of magnetite, for example, ferrous ions have been linked to cytotoxicity and catalytic activity. Several studies have shown the inhibition of cell growth in various microorganisms by magnetite nanoparticles, whereas maghemite nanoparticles exhibited lower toxicity (Aruojaet al., 2015), This cell-damaging activity was frequently ascribed to the generation of reactive oxygen species, especially under acidic conditions, in which magnetite may act as a Fenton catalyst. The iron ions can crystallize into more than 20 different forms of Oxides and (Oxy) hydroxides. Besides, the crystal structure, particle size and magnetization of iron oxides can be tuned by a range of reaction conditions (Book Reviews, 1997), However, in nanoparticles, compared to bulk materials, the transformation between the iron oxide forms happens so fast, increasing the need for better understanding of transition states at the nanoparticle level. Moreover, the oxidation of magnetite nanoparticles, especially under ambient conditions, could alter their composition and properties, in some way limiting their applications. Mild oxidation might bring some benefits in terms of particle stability and the creation of new structure-property relationships. In this paper, we report an investigation on the oxidation process of magnetite nanoparticles under mild and harsh conditions by tracking the changes of their magnetic properties, size and zeta potential. Mossbauer and Raman spectroscopy techniques will be complemented by X-ray diffraction to distinguish magnetite from maghemite and further outline the implications of these transformations regarding catalytic and cytotoxic behavior (Grosvenoret al., 2004). The interaction among synthesis conditions, environmental factors and surface modifications implies the need for continuous research in the field of magnetic nanoparticles to enable their full potential for application.
Importance and Advantages of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy
Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles can be synthesized by several methods, including physical, chemical and microbial techniques. The choice of the preparation method has significantly influenced the physical and chemical properties of these nanoparticles. Out of these, the chemical methods are the most prevalent due to the reasons of low cost and high yield. Commonly used chemical methods for synthesizing Fe3O4 NPs include thermal decomposition, hydrothermal, co-precipitation and microemulsion methods. Obviously, the most applied one is the co-precipitation method, whereby relatively easy and viable routes to the synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles with desired properties are found. Detailed knowledge of all methods will, in any case, be helpful in improving the synthesis for magnetic nanoparticles for many applications. Table 1 summarizes various methods for synthesizing nanoparticles, highlighting their principles, advantages, disadvantages, impact factors and references for further reading.
Method Name | Principle | Advantages | Disadvantages | Impact Factors | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microwave | It involves microwave radiation rapid heating of the precursors. | Short reaction time, higher yields, excellent reproducibility. | It is expensive and not suitable for scaling up and monitoring reactions. | Reaction time, precursor concentration. | (Saleemet al., 2021) |
Spray Pyrolysis | It involves aerosol formation followed by thermal decomposition. | Consistent size and shape, with small particle size. | Aggregation of particles, high cost. | Temperature, precursor type. | (Workieet al., 2023) |
Laser Pyrolysis | Laser-induced vaporization of precursors. | Small particle size, narrow size distribution. | Complicated, very expensive. | Laser intensity, precursor properties. | (D’Amatoet al., 2013) |
Thermal Decomposition | Decomposition of metal-organic precursors at high temperature. | Produces highly monodispersed particles. | High cost, long synthesis time, high temperature. | Heating rate, precursor type. | (Fereshteh et al., 2017) |
Microemulsion | Formation of nanoparticles in a microemulsion system. | Monodispersed nanoparticles with various morphologies. | Low efficiency, difficult to scale up. | Surfactant type, phase ratio. | (Maliket al., 2012) |
Although the process of preparing Fe3O4 NPs has reached its maturity, it is still challenged by various problems, some of which pertain to the production and others to the application. Aggregate formation is the major issue associated with Fe3O4 NPs; this basically results from the fact that these nanoparticles are less stable. This could reduce the efficiency of Fe3O4 NPs for different applications, mostly biomedical applications. According to Mohammadiet al., (2013), instability should be overcome (Mohammadiet al., 2013).
This, therefore, means there is a need to further modify the surface of Fe3O4 NPs to enhance their performance. Appropriate surface modifications will significantly increase the stability, targeting ability and biocompatibility of such nanoparticles for proper application in drug delivery and imaging (Ariaset al., 2018). During modification of iron oxide nanoparticles, several materials can be utilized, each with their advantages and probably applications. For instance, various surfactants or stabilizers can be added to obtain homogeneous distribution of size and avoid aggregation; for these particles, this represents one of the most important factors in activity related to therapeutic and diagnostic applications (Ariaset al., 2018).
The choice of surface modification material does not only affect the physical nature of the nanoparticles but also interaction with biological systems. Optimizing these modifications for enhancing the overall efficacy of Fe3O4 NPs in targeted applications is one of the aspects ongoing research projects is geared towards. The high count of materials at one’s disposal in modifying, as reported in Table 2, underlines the versatility and potential of Fe3O4 NPs within several scientific and medical fields.
Classification | Representative | Advantage | Application | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Inorganic Coatings | Silica | Enhances stability, reduces cytotoxicity. | Biomedical applications, drug delivery. | (Soenenet al., 2015) |
Biopolymer Coatings | Chitosan | Improves biocompatibility and dispersion. | Tissue engineering, drug delivery. | (Desaiet al., 2023) |
Polymer Coatings | Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) | Improves biocompatibility and dispersion. | Targeted drug delivery, imaging | (Shiet al., 2021) |
Metal Coatings | Gold | Enhances magnetic properties and stability. | Biosensing, imaging. | (Dheyabet al., 2020) |
Cross-linked Polymers | Poly (maleic anhydride-alt-1-octadecene)-PEG | Increases stability and reduces leaching | Biomedical applications, drug delivery | (Karakotiet al., 2015) |
Polymeric Matrixes | Polylactic Acid (PLA) | Biocompatible, reduces toxicity. | Drug delivery, tissue engineering. | (Sharmaet al., 2021) |
Surfactants | Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide (CTAB) | Improves dispersion and stability. | Drug delivery, imaging. | (Liu et al., 2020) |
Synthesis and Characterization Techniques of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Iron oxide nanoparticles synthesis methods
In general, there are 2 broad categories for the synthesis of nanoparticles: top-down and bottom-up approaches. Top-down techniques mostly involve breaking down bulk material into smaller particles using mechanical energy by crushing, milling, or grinding. Another technique in this category includes laser ablation, sputtering, etching and electron beam deposition. While these are basically environment-friendly methods, they tend to be time-consuming and energy-intensive (Soenenet al., 2015). The bottom-up approach relies on the chemical interactions between certain atoms, ions, or molecules to generate nanoparticles (Desaiet al., 2023; Shiet al., 2021). All these methods of synthesis can be generalized by being divided into three groups according to the nature of the processes: the physical ones, which are somehow close to the top-down ones; the chemical methods, among which one can mention co-precipitation, sol-gel, thermal decomposition, emulsion and microemulsion, hydrothermal, microwave-assisted techniques; and the biological methods, which rely on plants or microorganisms to produce the nanoparticles. The latter two categories relate to bottom-up strategies (Shiet al., 2021).
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
IONPs have gained considerable attention due to their unique properties and applications across different disciplines like biomedicine, environmental remediation and uses in electronics. Their nanoparticle synthesis can be carried out using different methodologies, with each having its various pros and cons. Typically employed techniques are co-precipitation, sol-gel synthesis, microemulsion, thermal decomposition, hydrothermal synthesis and green synthesis (Shiet al., 2021; Dheyabet al., 2020; Karakotiet al., 2015; Sharmaet al., 2021) (Figure 2). Comparison of the most used methods for the synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.

Figure 2:
This is a graphical representation of the prevalence of the most common methods for nanoparticle synthesis.
Co-Precipitation Techniques in Nanomaterial Synthesis
Co-precipitation is the most popular method for synthesizing IONPs because of the simplicity and low cost involved. Iron salts are mixed in an aqueous solution and a precipitating agent is added to provoke the formation of nanoparticles. Figure 3 illustrates the major types of methods for synthesizing iron oxide nanoparticles, with a particular emphasis on co-precipitation techniques in nanomaterial synthesis.

Figure 3:
The major types of methods for the synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles are.
The size and morphology of the formed nanoparticles are controlled by tuning some reaction parameters like pH, temperature and reactants’ concentration. However, it is difficult to obtain a uniform particle size and prevent agglomeration. Mascoloet al., 2013 reviewed the synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles by co-precipitation at room temperature within a wide pH range with the use of different bases; therefore, it confirmed that such techniques were quite easy for the control of particle features. Their findings further highlight the impact of pH on nanoparticle morphology and size in catalysis and biomedical applications (Liuet al., 2020). Sharmaet al., 2016 went further to contribute to the co-precipitation discourse by focusing on synthesizing Fe3O4-supported Nano catalysts. They were able to synthesize and characterize such catalysts and apply them in various coupling reactions. Their work has been able to highlight the efficacy of iron oxide nanoparticles in catalysis and hence may probably open their utilization toward green chemical applications (Niculescuet al., 2022). Deregibuset al., 2016 contributed to this through a charge-based precipitation strategy for the isolation of extracellular vesicles that gives example of the amenability of co-precipitation methods beyond the traditional synthesis of nanoparticles, generalizing their applications in biological systems (Aryalet al., 2019).
Theisset al., 2016 reviewed the synthesis of layered double hydroxides by co-precipitation methods. It is shown that metal cations exert a serious influence on the choice of conditions for the structural and physicochemical properties of the resulting LDHs. With such controllable properties through co-precipitation, these materials could be applicable for such areas as catalysis, drug delivery, or waste remediation (Singhet al., 2020). Dipponget al., (2021) reported on the recent progress in MFe2O4 synthesis and applications with M=Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn nanoparticles through co-precipitation. Their review focuses on methods and consequent features of such nanoparticles relevant for their application in magnetic separation, drug delivery and as MRI contrast agents (Niculescuet al., 2022).
Although co-precipitation techniques have developed tremendously, there are many knowledge gaps that need to be bridged. First, the effects of different environmental conditions like temperature, ionic strength and the presence of surfactants on the co-precipitation process and the resultant nanoparticle properties. Although co-precipitation has shown great promise as a method for synthesizing a wide range of nanoparticles, the scalability of such processes for industrial applications has remained underexplored. Future studies must therefore be focused on the optimization methods in co-precipitation for large-scale production, where uniformity and reproducibility in nanoparticle characteristics are guaranteed. Their integration with co-precipitation techniques could, however, give rise to new synthesis methodologies, such as sol-gel or hydrothermal processes for the development of nanomaterials with enhanced functionalities. Such hybrid approaches could lead to new routes for the tailoring of materials with specific applications in catalysis, biomedicine and environmental remediation.
Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Sol-gel systems undergo a transition of a liquid solution-to-solid gel phase, making it possible to control the size and morphology of the nanoparticles. It also offers the ability to yield homogeneous nanoparticles with high purity, but the process generally takes longer time, and the environment must be controlled quite well.
The sol-gel route for the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles is a quite reliable way to synthesize them with controlled characteristics. According to Bokovet al., 2021, this process is much simpler and allows one to obtain homogeneous materials with predetermined properties. This will allow for control of pH, temperature, precursor concentration, etc.-parameters that tend to have a direct effect on the characteristics of synthesized nanoparticles (Mihaiet al., 2020).
According to Cui et al., the low-temperature sol-gel synthesis of iron oxide was reported to have a phase transition between α-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4. The results underline how control over the conditions of synthesis is necessary to get the required phase purity and homogeneity. Normally, it forms a good example of how, by tuning sol-gel parameters, phase transitions can be controlled (Rashidet al., 2020). Parasharet al., 2020 commented in their paper on a review about the synthesis, characterization and applications of the metal oxide nanoparticles technique using the sol-gel method, which is versatile and efficient (Mascoloet al., 2013).
Wuet al., 2015 further discussed the surface functionalization strategies of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, which are very important in improving their biocompatibility and stability in biomedical applications. The possibility of functionalizing IONPs during the sol-gel process opens new opportunities for them in targeted drug delivery and magnetic resonance imaging (Sharmaet al., 2016).
Although the sol-gel synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles has advanced tremendously over recent years, many gaps remain in knowledge. More specifically, concerning long-term stability and toxicity in green-synthesized nanoparticles within biological systems, as highlighted by (Ariaset al., 2018), this needs deeper work. Safe knowledge on the biodistribution and degradation pathways of such nanoparticles is required for the use in biomedicine.
Although the sol-gel technique allows the synthesis of nanoparticles with specific properties, the scalability of such processes for commercial applications remains an open challenge. Future investigations should be oriented toward the optimization of sol-gel synthesis parameters for large-scale production without losses at the level of quality and homogeneity of the nanoparticles (Deregibuset al., 2016).
Microemulsion techniques for the synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles
The microemulsion technique uses surfactants to stabilize the formation of nanoparticles in the microemulsion system, leading to highly homogeneous and well-dispersed IONPs. In this process, very good control over particle size and shape canb be achieved, but surfactants are used, which complicates further purification processes.
One of the phenomenal advantages of this micro-emulsion technique is the exceptional control required over the size and shape of the particles used. By proper adjustments in concentration in surfactants, oil, water and reaction conditions, the method can be well-controlled for synthesizing IONP of desired properties. For instance, the size of the nanoparticles may be changed through variations in the surfactant-to-oil ratio, while their morphology might be adjusted through the choice of surfactant. This kind of control becomes quite important when dealing with applications where the magnetic behavior, surface reactivity, or biocompatibility of the nanoparticles depend crucially on their size and shape. Equally important is that uniformity is obtained through microemulsion technique. Surfactants create a confined space for the nanoparticles to be formed, with reduced chances of aggregation and assurance of well-dispersed particles in solutions. This kind of homogeneity becomes an important criterion for many bio applications, where the batch-to-batch consistency of properties in a material becomes an important aspect, for example, in drug delivery, imaging and catalysis. For the field of biomedical applications, where targeting and controlled release must take place at precise points, the efficacy of IONPs can be further enhanced due to the well-defined size distribution of the particles.
The microemulsion methods are outstanding, particularly owing to their capability of developing nanoparticles that are uniform in size and shape. It involves the formation of a thermodynamically stable isotropic liquid mixture comprising water, oil and surfactant, acting as nanoreactors for the synthesis of nanoparticles. This controlled environment allows modifying the particle properties very precisely, hence being one of the most preferred options for the synthesis of IONPs in various applications by Wuet al., 2015 (Sharmaet al., 2016).
Overall, a combination of state-of-the-art characterization tools is needed to understand generally the structure-property relationships of iron oxide nanoparticles. It can be very helpful in understanding how different synthesis conditions affect the functional properties of IONPs to design tailored nanoparticles for appropriate use.
Thermal Decomposition for the Synthesis of Iron Nanoparticles
Another effective technique is that of thermal decomposition, where iron precursors are decomposed at very high temperatures to obtain nanoparticles.
It has been shown that surfactants such as oleic acid, when applied in the process of thermal decomposition, make it possible to produce monodisperse superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Not only is magnetic performance improved, but size variability is significantly reduced-a factor that is very critical where the absolute value of magnetism is required for an application (Theisset al., 2016). The development of this synthesis technique has placed the method at the forefront of technology in the production of monodisperse, spherical iron oxide nanoparticles with size and morphology that could be modified at will (Dipponget al., 2021). Although the synthesis of iron nanoparticles through thermal decomposition has seen many developments, it is still not devoid of knowledge gaps. The energy intensity involved in the process of thermal decomposition is a major limitation to its large-scale applications. Future studies should therefore aim at optimizing the thermal decomposition process so that it reduces energy consumption without compromising the quality of synthesized nanoparticles. Also, fully unequivocal advantages in improving the properties of iron nanoparticles by surfactants have been evident; however, more studies are required to be conducted on the long-term stability and biocompatibility of these surfactant-coated nanoparticles. Interactions of surfactants with the biological system need to be understood for translation of results from the laboratory to clinics. Complications brought about by mixed iron oxide phases and crystal defects in the absence of oxygen underline the requirement for much more in-depth studies on the effects of synthesis conditions on nanoparticle properties. The exploitation of alternative syntheses or changes in the synthesis procedure will help avoid these problems and improve the magnetic properties of the nanoparticles.
Advanced iron oxide nanoparticles characterization techniques
Iron oxide nanoparticles have been receiving escalated interest since their inception because of some outstanding properties such as superparamagnetic, high surface area and biocompatibility feats that make these feasible for almost every application, be it in the biomedical or environmental fields (Bokovet al., 2021). Such characterizations of nanoparticles are indispensable for the understanding of their structure, magnetic and chemical properties, which have a direct relevance to their functionality in applications related to drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging and environmental remediation. Size, morphology, crystallinity and surface characteristics of IONPs are attainable from advanced characterization techniques such as transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and dynamic light scattering (Cuiet al., 2013). In this regard, TEM is necessary to visualize the size and shape of particles at the nanoscale, while XRD is used to determine crystalline phases and purities in the synthesis of nanoparticles. Other surface characterization techniques that focus on the surface chemistry of the nanoparticles are Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), which is aimed at illustrating its thermal stability. Thus, such techniques have advanced the potential to develop specific properties of IONPs into broad application utilities across the scientific and industrial worlds. Therefore, clearly, these characterization techniques have provided the underpinning that paves the way to the meaningful applications of these special nanoparticles (Parasharet al., 2020). The shape of iron oxide nanoparticles conditions their behavior and induces potential cell toxicity. Thus, at the stage of their synthesis, there is an important control of the shape of the nanoparticles to avoid harmful impacts. Electron microscopy methods are normally applied to control morphology and shape of such nanoparticles. Besides shape, crystal structure and chemical composition remain the other two characterization parameters in the development of IONPs. Among all the prevailing techniques, X-ray diffraction is used for assessing crystal structure and phases (Wuet al., 2015). However, it has been reported that in the case of nanoparticles smaller than 5 nm, the XRD patterns can be influenced profoundly, thus requiring other alternatives to perform the analysis. One such promising alternative to X-ray analyses is selected-area electron diffraction, which can provide a more realistic and accurate representation of the nanoparticle crystal structures. Lastly, the chemical and elemental compositional tests must be determined for the nanoparticle to estimate purity and impact upon electrochemical activity. Electron energy loss spectroscopy techniques can differentiate between Iron (II) and Iron (III), which will be helpful in differentiating the phases of iron oxides present in the nanoparticles (Ciriminnaet al., 2013).
While high surface areas of IONPs might tend to cause agglomeration, they are of immense importance in applications requiring high surface areas for maximizing pollutant sorption and maximum efficiency with respect to pollutants. Various gas sorption-based methods, particularly BET analysis, are commonly used for measuring surface area (Hufschmidet al., 2015).
The surface charge on IONPs is directly linked to their colloidal stability and interactions in vivo environments, which regulate the formation of a protein corona on their surface and determine cellular uptake. Surface charge is characterized by the zeta potential, measured by a zeta potentiometer, in millivolts. Usually, a zeta potential above+15 mV or below-15 mV is found to be sufficient to give rise to electrostatic repulsion for the prevention of aggregation in colloidally stable suspensions. The zeta potential can be dramatically affected by factors such as pH, ionic strength and the presence of both charged and uncharged molecules (Cuiet al., 2013; Heet al., 2013).
Photothermal Therapy (PTT)
Photothermal Therapy (PTT) procedure is a novel and innovative treatment method that operates by introducing heat into the intended tissue like tumors using electromagnetic radiation, especially near-infrared light. Thermal ablation is where heat localizes the area of damage and destroys cancer cells by raising their temperature to thermal levels. The advantage of PTT is its non-invasive nature, targeting specificity and minimal invasion to normal tissues. Researchers are particularly interested in this technique, especially in cancer treatment, because it could very precisely destroy only tumors without affecting normal cells (Rocaet al., 2019).
By virtue of their unique properties, Photothermal Therapy (PTT) Employing Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs) has emerged as a promising strategy in cancer treatment, leveraging light irradiation to enhance therapeutic capabilities (Anuet al., 2017). IONPs exhibit high Photothermal Conversion Efficiency (PCE) Under Near-Infrared (NIR) laser irradiation due to improved tissue penetration with minimal non-specific scattering and absorption. This allows targeted heating of tumor cells while avoiding damage to healthy tissue, reducing side effects compared to traditional methods (Mourdikoudiset al., 2018). Advances in IONP synthesis and functionalization have led to biocompatible nanoparticles with improved photothermal efficiency, making them suitable for clinical use. For instance, conjugating gold coatings on IONPs has significantly improved their PTT properties, effectively destroying cancer cells like MCF-7 breast cancer cells under NIR irradiation. Functionalizing IONPs with tumor-targeting ligands enhances their accumulation in cancer tissues, minimizing systemic exposure. Researchers are also exploring the synergistic effects of combining PTT with chemotherapy or immunotherapy to achieve superior therapeutic efficacy. As research progresses, IONPs are expanding the potential for innovative cancer treatment strategies that harness nanotechnology (Koopmanset al., 2020).
Iron Oxide NPs for PTT
IONPs show a high potential to be used as agents. Besides, they can also act as photothermal agents. Espinosa et al., pointed out that IONPs have a twofold ability in cancer treatment; therefore, a combination of MHT with PTT would enhance the outcome significantly because heating efficiency will be multiplied. It is through this bimodal therapy treatment that the tumor gets thermally ablated while the healthy tissue around it remains safe (Anuet al., 2017). It has been established through research that incorporating iron oxide nanoparticles with other nanoparticles like gold can yield some results. In one of the studies conducted on 2017 by Yang et al., loading iron oxide and gold nanoparticles into phosphorus sheets proved capable of slowing tumor growth. To attain this, the study had applied PTT coupled with photodynamic therapy. The result shows the potential of application applicability for IONPs under different treatment strategies (Ismailet al., 2019).
IONPs are known to be very good photothermal agents, with a light absorption ability in the near-infrared 700-1100 nm range, a factor that allows them to penetrate tissues while minimizing damage to the surrounding healthy cells. IONPs, upon NIR light illumination, convert the absorbed light energy into heat (Modenaet al., 2019). Their efficiency in the process is mainly governed by factors such as concentration, power density and duration of exposure. This heat produced has the result of increasing the temperature of the tumor environment and often exceeds 42°C (Zhaoet al., 2021). This leads to the destruction of the structure and the cells by apoptosis. More interestingly, the efficacy of IONPs in photothermal therapy can be enhanced when they aggregate together (Estelrichet al., 2018). This could result in more efficient production of heat since the more aggregated the nanoparticles, the more absorption of NIR light. Moreover, IONPs can be combined with therapeutic approaches targeting or drug delivery systems to enhance the effectiveness of tumor ablation. Mechanism of Action Schematic of Iron Oxide NPs for PTT shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4:
Mechanism of Action Schematic of Iron Oxide NPs for PTT.
IONPs are one of the most promising nanoparticles to transform cancer treatment into innovative ways in PTT. Their characteristics, including strong light absorption, efficient conversion and generation of heat when exposed to a laser, make them extremely effective as agents (Yuet al., 2024). Compared to traditional methods of treating cancer, the main advantages of PTT using IONPs are specificity, minimal invasiveness and precise control over time and space. IONPs could target and kill cancer cells of tumors or locally spread metastases. A crucial role of IONPs in cancer treatment can also be in conjunction with conventional techniques against metastatic sites. Different results have shown the efficacy of IONPs-mediated PTT in studies on models with metastases in the lungs, bones, or lymph nodes. Research is underway to produce biocompatible IONPs and therapeutically efficient nanostructures that would further their use in a medical setting (Giménezet al., 2022). Methods using nanocubes or magnetic nanoclusters have been shown to generate heat and improve tumor destruction following NIR laser light exposure. Researchers are working on multifunctional
IONPs that integrate PTT with targeting, MRI and drug delivery for full cancer treatment (Espinosaet al., 2018). IONPs will play a major role in cancer detection and treatment methods that are developing as fast as technology does. These nanoparticles, due to their unique properties and versatility, are sure to make a revolution in cancer therapy by opening new ways of PTT and other applications in cancer therapy. Therefore, future studies in this field hold immense promise for helping enhance outcomes for patients and advancing in the fight against cancer (Anuet al., 2017).
Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
Overview of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
PDT induces the destruction of tumors through three major mechanisms, as indicated in Figure 5. Nanoparticles in Photodynamic therapy, also known as IONPs, open up a whole new frontier of treatment options against cancer, simply by altering the properties of these particles to achieve successful treatment results (Yanget al., 2017). PDT uses photosensitizers that involve the generation of ROS, which upon illumination by light at a specific wavelength result in cell death. Inclusion of IONP into PDT presents several advantages on solubility, targeted delivery and tissue penetration, all of which increase the maximum effect of the treatments. The study illustrated that nanoparticles, IONPs, when combined with photosensitizers like porphyrins, are highly capable of handling cancer. (Yanget al., 2017) For example, tetra-sulfonatophenyl porphyrin modified γ-Fe3O4 nanoparticles had some success in targeting human melanoma cells upon light exposure. This suggests that these nanoparticle complexes are capable of effectively generating ROS to inhibit the growth of tumor cells. The potential of IONPs to load and deliver therapeutic levels of photosensitizers into the regions of tumors strengthens their use in PDT, especially for hydrophobic photosensitizers that normally have poor solubility properties.

Figure 5:
PDT mechanisms for tumor destruction (Menget al., 2024).
IONPs have been shown to increase the production of 1O2, a key ROS utilized in PDT therapy to elicit cell death in cancer. The work by Ling et al., presents one such pH responsive approach whereby IONPs enable a Fenton-like reaction only in the reductive, acidic tumor environment. This reaction increases the yield of 1O2, permitting targeted toxicity toward cancer cells while minimizing harm to surrounding healthy tissue (Amatyaet al., 2021). About the attachment of Linoleic Acid Hydroperoxide (LAHP) to IONPs, Dulińska-Litewka et al., demonstrated an increase in oxygen generation. This increase is useful for photodynamic therapy since it enhances the effectiveness of 1O2 production in a variety of environments. The release of Iron (II) ions from the IONPs participates in the activation of this system, which places much emphasis on pH in the treatment outcome. This mechanism does not allow better selectivity of treatment.
It is also indicative of the potential role of IONPs in developing advanced targeted cancer therapy based on the properties of the tumor microenvironment (Guoet al., 2022).
PDT is a treatment using a substance that would be more concentrated in rapidly dividing cells, those undergoing cancerous changes. One exposes this substance to light; it changes to produce ROS-singlet oxygen and free radicals (Vallabaniet al., 2018).
Another critical aspect of PDT is the proper selection of light wavelengths for activation. This wavelength should have satisfactory tissue penetration such that it gets the photosensitizer activated throughout the tumor. The normal wavelengths used for PDT are in the range of 600 to 850 nanometers because they have maximum tissue penetration. This range has less absorption by hemoglobin and water, hence can reach the deep tissues before it losses it is intensity (Vallabaniet al., 2018). What sets PDT apart is its capability to precisely focus on the tumor site using light while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues by activating the photosensitizer solely in that area. The use of iron oxide nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy marks progress in cancer treatment approaches. These nanoparticles can produce oxygen in conditions and their compatibility along with their versatile properties make them a potential platform for developing treatment methods. To ensure effective use in cancer care it’s crucial to fill the knowledge gaps and focus on research areas (Rethiet al., 2023).
Iron and Composites for Imaging Guided PDT
Imaging guided PDT has remained in the forefront with iron and composite materials. This new modality of treatment deploys a combination of light-activated PS and ROS generation for the selective destruction of tumors. Iron-based compounds, particularly IONPs, revolutionized the PDT strategy by offering enhanced imaging capabilities and treatment effectiveness. Such properties allow IONPs to act as contrast agents in MRI during PDT procedures, permitting the real-time visualization of locations of tumors.
The wide potential of IONPs in research ranges from imaging and drug delivery to their application as therapeutic agents. Among them, a very important one is the self-assembly of IONPs with MoS2 nanosheets, shown by Liu et al., for the generation of MoS2 IO nanocomposites (Grancharovaet al., 2024). PEG in this composite enhances its stability and permits the use of cancer treatment enabled by multimodal imaging guidance. These
self-assembling systems offer a flexible approach to incorporating imaging and therapeutic capabilities in one system.
While Ling et al., reported the development of tumor pH-sensitive magnetic Nano grenades using pH responsive ligands. It is not only that the said Nano grenades aid in imaging, as they also enhance the localized therapeutic effect of photodynamic therapy because of the selective release of agents in the acidic tumor microenvironment. This strategy went on to underline responsiveness in achieving better treatment outcomes (Amatyaet al., 2021).
Despite all the progress in the use of iron and its composites for imaging-guided photodynamic therapy, knowledge gaps remain. Most of the research works are focused on the development and characterization of these materials; only a few studies provide emphasis on long-term compatibility and effects on the body. Future studies should focus on the deep evaluation for the toxicity test of nanoparticles to ensure their safety for clinical use. Secondly, the interaction of PDT agents with the tumor microenvironment is still not very clear and needs to be well explored. Investigations on the influence of factors like acidity, hypoxia and other environmental conditions on the effectiveness of iron-based composites could culminate in treatment protocols. Finally, there is an emerging need to study the potential of personalized medicine approaches in imaging-guided PDT. Tailoring treatment plans based on the characteristics of the tumors and individual responses may enhance outcomes and minimize side effects.
Clinical Applications and Case Studies
Clinical Applications of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy
The application of iron oxide nanoparticles is one of the most important tools of cancer therapy that exhibits its characteristic features both in diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Below Figure 6 shows an overview of their clinical applications, particularly in cancer treatment.

Figure 6:
Clinical Applications of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy.
Cancer Diagnosis and Imaging
IONPs have become an exciting tool in the diagnosis and imaging of cancer, particularly because of their unique features and functionalization capabilities. Among the major advantages of IONPs is the potential to be functionalized using targeting ligands, such as antibodies or peptides that enhance the specificity of the latter to the chosen cancer cells. This significantly increases the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging and allows molecular imaging needed for many cancers, including those in the breast, liver and brain (Dolmanset al., 2003). These dual functions increase treatment efficacy while reducing side effects. Superparamagnetic properties of IONPs contribute to improved MRI contrast, thereby allowing better differentiation of tumors, especially small ones. Finally, magnetic IONPs used for the isolation and enrichment of rare tumor cells from blood samples provide a good avenue in the setting of early cancer detection and on-carrying monitoring. These applications, therefore, are going to underscore the potential that IONPs are to have in advancing cancer diagnostic and treatment strategies (Linget al., 2014). Very recent research has pointed out the multifunctionality of IONPs, which can be fabricated to generate particles that play dual functions in diagnostic imaging and therapeutic delivery. For instance, Cheng et al., have commented that functionalized IONPs would not only be internalized for magnetic resonance imaging but also for PAT, therefore providing a multimodal platform for imaging that can improve the detection and characterization of tumors. Hence, this potential dual capability may be the indication that IONPs can do much in the simplification of cancer diagnosis by providing integrated imaging information in one platform (Dulińska-Litewkaet al., 2019).
Immune modulation therapy
Iron oxide nanoparticles represent one such tool under development to modulate the immune system against cancer. Recent studies reveal a new role for IONPs in interacting with different immune cells and eliciting anti-tumor immune responses, capable of enhancing cancer immunotherapies (Correiaet al., 2021). This capability to modulate the immune system opens new avenues for combinatorial applications of IONPs with immunotherapy strategies and potentially offers improvements in the effectiveness of cancer treatments. One of the key mechanisms underlying IONP-mediated immunomodulation is related to their ability to reprogram tumor-associated macrophages. IONPs were shown to polarize TAMs into a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype through the overexpression of genes related to this subtype, including IL-12 and TNF-α. This type of reprogramming is very important for the induction of antitumor immune responses because M1 macrophages are able to trap, phagocytose and kill tumor cells (Allisonet al., 2013).
The pro-inflammatory properties of IONPs, including skewing macrophages and Dendritic Cells (DCs) toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype, have been harnessed with cancer vaccines (Agostiniset al., 2011). The IONPs were used to carry antigens and to boost the internalization, processing and presentation of antigens to the T cell within a microenvironment of inflammation (Allisonet al., 2013). Preclinical applicability is proved for these vaccines, as IONP-based vaccines could delay tumor progress and lower metastasis in animal models. IONPs have also shown potential in the modulation of different aspects of the tumor microenvironment toward creating a more conducive environment for anti-sufficient immunity, such as hypoxic and immunosuppressive factors. For example, IONPs can deliver drugs, antigens and adjuvants to the tumor site, overcoming obstacles like the extracellular matrix while avoiding their possible degradation and clearance. In this way, a targeted delivery approach allows for a greater effective concentration of such immunomodulatory agents at the desired site for potentially higher therapeutic efficacy (Liuet al., 2015).
Hyperthermia Therapy
Another major clinical application of iron oxide nanoparticle is magnetic fluid hyperthermia, in which an alternating magnetic field is applied, directly heating the tumor tissues. Adopting this new approach enhances the sensitivity of tumor cells to conventional cancer therapies like chemotherapy and radiation, increasing their effectiveness (Cortajarenaet al., 2014). Clinical trials have shown that MFH can improve the survival rate in patients with various cancers; therefore, it can become a very useful treatment. Magnetic hyperthermia is currently the only thermal nanomedicine approved by FDA; thus, it has high clinical value despite issues of acceptance and translating it in everyday clinical use. The technique is based on the injection of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles into the tumor itself or nearby; these nanoparticles will, in turn, be exposed to an alternating magnetic field (Farinhaet al., 2021). The nanoparticles will then heat up due to magnetic hysteresis and relaxation processes in response, leading to increases in the local temperature to levels that could attain therapeutic temperatures of about 42-45°C (Allisonet al., 2013). Such temperatures can initiate the process of apoptosis, or programmed cell death, in tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. However, limitations such as the low potency of the IONP fluid to dissipate enough heat, nanoparticles’ insufficient concentration at the site of the tumor and inhomogeneous distribution of these fluids within the tumor may greatly impede treatment effectiveness (Chenget al., 2011). Table 3 shows Case Studies and Clinical Experience.
Case Study | Nanoparticle Innovation | CancerType | Key Findings | References |
Magnetic fluid hyperthermia. | Iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia. | Various | Successful demonstration to enhance overall survival in clinical trials, but struggles to establish a wider clinical presence. | (Chunget al., 2021; Mulens-Ariaset al., 2021) |
Immune-modulating potential of iron oxide nanoparticles. | Harnessing immune-nanoparticle interactions to induce anti-tumor immune responses. | Various | Recent data demonstrates interactions between immune cells and iron oxide nanoparticles can induce anti-tumor immune responses. | (Khatuaet al., 2024; ; Chenget al., 2021; Etemadi et al., 2020) |
Targeted delivery of paclitaxel to breast cancer cells. | Anti-HER2/neu peptide-conjugated iron oxide nanoparticles. | Breast cancer. | Nanoparticles successfully delivered paclitaxel to breast cancer cells overexpressing HER2/neu. | (Vassalloet al., 2023) |
Improving antitumor potential and reducing resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. | Multivalent exposure of trastuzumab on iron oxide nanoparticles. | Breast cancer. | Multivalent trastuzumab on iron oxide nanoparticles improved antitumor potential and reduced resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer cells. | (Obaidatet al., 2019; Blanco-Andujaret al., 2016; Khoranaet al., 2016) |
Targeted delivery of doxorubicin to breast cancer cells. | Mucin-1 aptamer-armed superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. | Ovarian cancer. | Mucin-1 aptamer-armed iron oxide nanoparticles successfully delivered doxorubicin to breast cancer cells overexpressing Mucin-1. | (Vilgelm et al., 2019) |
Sensitization of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. | Magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles. | Breast cancer. | Iron oxide nanoparticles sensitized cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin treatment in vitro. | (Yanget al., 2018) |
Inducing oxidative stress and cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells. | Doxorubicin-loaded iron oxide nanoparticles. | Breast cancer. | Doxorubicin-loaded iron oxide nanoparticles induced oxidative stress and cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells. | (Ruet al., 2019) |
CONCLUSION
It is expected that the development of iron oxide nanoparticles in cancer therapy will represent a new frontier in the search for active and targeted treatment modalities. This review has underlined IONP multifunctional roles: their unique properties of superparamagnetic, biocompatibility and surface functionalization enhance their application in targeted drug delivery, hyperthermia and imaging. As discussed, IONPs can bring about a dramatic change in the therapeutic outcome of such treatments, making them localized to reduce systemic toxicity. They are known to induce apoptosis in tumoral cells after controlling heating in magnetic hyperthermia and improve tumor visualization for diagnosis and better planning of treatment when used as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. While synthesis and characterization of IONPs have significantly evolved over the past years, many challenges remain to be overcome, mainly concerning biocompatibility and scaling-up production methods. Further studies on the subject will need to focus on solving such issues. More specifically, this may be through combination therapy developing IONPs with other treatment modalities and further studies into their immunomodulatory effects. The present inventions of iron oxide nanoparticles show new hope in the therapy of cancer, providing both personalized and more effective treatment strategies. Further research is required in this area to completely explore the potential of IONPs so that better outcomes can be ensured for patients and the quality of life can be enhanced.
Cite this article
Roy M, Sheikh M, Telange D. Exploring Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Innovations and Applications in Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Pharm. Investigation. 2025;15(3):793-808.
References
- Agostinis, P., Berg, K., Cengel, K. A., Foster, T. H., Girotti, A. W., Gollnick, S. O., Hahn, S. M., Hamblin, M. R., Juzeniene, A., Kessel, D., Korbelik, M., Moan, J., Mroz, P., Nowis, D., Piette, J., Wilson, B. C., & Golab, J. (2011). Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(4), 250–281. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20114
- Ahn, T., Kim, J. H., Yang, H.-M., Lee, J. W., & Kim, J.-D. (2012). Formation pathways of magnetite nanoparticles by coprecipitation method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 116(10), 6069–6076. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp211843g
- Ali, A., Zafar, H., Zia, M., Ul Haq, I., Phull, A. R., Ali, J. S., & Hussain, A. (2016). Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications. NSA, 9, 49–67. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S99986
- Allison, R. R., & Moghissi, K. (2013). Photodynamic therapy (PDT): PDT mechanisms. Clinical Endoscopy, 46(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.1.24
- Alphandéry, E. (2020). Iron oxide nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Drug Discovery Today, 25(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.09.020
- Amatya, R., Hwang, S., Park, T., Min, K. A., & Shin, M. C. (2021). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of pegylated starch-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced photothermal cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics, 13(6), 871. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13060871
- Anu Mary Ealia, S., & Saravanakumar, M. P. (2017). A review on the classification, characterisation, synthesis of nanoparticles and their application. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 263, Article 032019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/263/3/032019
- Arias, L. S., Pessan, J. P., Vieira, A. P. M., de Lima, T. M. T., Delbem, A. C. B., & Monteiro, D. R. (2018). Iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications: A perspective on synthesis, drugs, antimicrobial activity and toxicity. Antibiotics, 7(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics7020046
- Aruoja, V., Pokhrel, S., Sihtmäe, M., Mortimer, M., Mädler, L., & Kahru, A. (2015). Toxicity of 12 metal-based nanoparticles to algae, bacteria and protozoa. Environmental Science: Nano, 2(6), 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EN00057B
- Aryal, S., Park, H., Leary, J. F., & Key, J. (2019). Top-down fabrication-based nano/microparticles for molecular imaging and drug delivery. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 14, 6631–6644. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S212037
- Baabu, P. R. S., Kumar, H. K., Gumpu, M. B., Babu K, J., Kulandaisamy, A. J., & Rayappan, J. B. B. (2022). Iron oxide nanoparticles: A review on the province of its compounds, properties and biological applications. Materials, 16(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010059
- Bateer, B., Tian, C., Qu, Y., Du, S., Tan, T., Wang, R., Tian, G., & Fu, H. (2013). Facile synthesis and shape control of Fe3O4 nanocrystals with good dispersion and stabilization. CrystEngComm, 15(17), 3366–3371. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CE40123E
- Blanco-Andujar, C., Walter, A., Cotin, G., Bordeianu, C., Mertz, D., Felder-Flesch, D., & Begin-Colin, S. (2016). Design of iron oxide-based Nanoparticles for MRI and Magnetic Hyperthermia. Nanomedicine, 11(14), 1889–1910. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-5001
- Bokov, D., Turki Jalil, A., Chupradit, S., Suksatan, W., Javed Ansari, M., Shewael, I. H., Valiev, G. H., & Kianfar, E. (2021). Nanomaterial by sol‐gel method: Synthesis and application. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021(1), Article 5102014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5102014
- Boverhof, D. R., Bramante, C. M., Butala, J. H., Clancy, S. F., Lafranconi, M., West, J., & Gordon, S. C. (2015). Comparative assessment of nanomaterial definitions and safety evaluation considerations. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 73(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.06.001
- Cheng, H.-W., Tsao, H.-Y., Chiang, C.-S., & Chen, S.-Y. (2021). Advances in magnetic nanoparticle-mediated cancer immune-theranostics. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 10(1), Article e2001451. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001451
- Cheng, Y., Zhao, L., Li, Y., & Xu, T. (2011). Design of biocompatible dendrimers for cancer diagnosis and therapy: Current status and future perspectives. Chemical Society Reviews, 40(5), 2673–2703. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00097c
- Chung, S., Revia, R. A., & Zhang, M. (2021). Zhang M. Iron oxide nanoparticles for immune cell labeling and cancer immunotherapy. Nanoscale Horizons, 6(9), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NH00179E
- Ciriminna, R., Fidalgo, A., Pandarus, V., Béland, F., Ilharco, L. M., & Pagliaro, M. (2013). The sol–gel route to advanced silica-based materials and recent applications. Chemical Reviews, 113(8), 6592–6620. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300399c
- Correia, J. H., Rodrigues, J. A., Pimenta, S., Dong, T., & Yang, Z. (2021). Photodynamic therapy review: Principles, photosensitizers, applications and future directions. Pharmaceutics, 13(9), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13091332
- Book reviews. Announcements. (1997). Corrosion Reviews, 15(3–4), 533–559. https://doi.org/10.1515/CORRREV.1997.15.3-4.533
- Cortajarena, A. L., Ortega, D., Ocampo, S. M., Gonzalez-García, A., Couleaud, P., Miranda, R., Belda-Iniesta, C., & Ayuso-Sacido, A. (2014). Engineering iron oxide nanoparticles for clinical settings. Nanobiomedicine, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.5772/58841
- Cree, I. A., & Charlton, P. (2017). Molecular chess? Hallmarks of anti-cancer drug resistance. BMC Cancer, 17(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2999-1
- Cui, H., Liu, Y., & Ren, W. (2013). Structure switch between α-Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 during the large scale and low temperature sol–gel synthesis of nearly monodispersed iron oxide nanoparticles. Advanced Powder Technology, 24(1), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2012.03.001
- Dadfar, S. M., Roemhild, K., Drude, N. I., von Stillfried, S., Knüchel, R., Kiessling, F., & Lammers, T. (2019). Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 138, 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.005
- D’Amato, R., Falconieri, M., Gagliardi, S., Popovici, E., Serra, E., Terranova, G., & Borsella, E. (2013). Synthesis of ceramic nanoparticles by laser pyrolysis: From research to applications. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 104, 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.05.026
- Daou, T. J., Pourroy, G., Bégin-Colin, S., Grenèche, J. M., Ulhaq-Bouillet, C., Legaré, P., Bernhardt, P., Leuvrey, C., & Rogez, G. (2006). Hydrothermal synthesis of monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles. Chemistry of Materials, 18(18), 4399–4404. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm060805r
- Deregibus, M. C., Figliolini, F., D’antico, S., Manzini, P. M., Pasquino, C., De Lena, M., Tetta, C., Brizzi, M. F., & Camussi, G. (2016). Charge-based precipitation of extracellular vesicles. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 38(5), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2759
- Desai, N., Rana, D., Salave, S., Gupta, R., Patel, P., Karunakaran, B., Sharma, A., Giri, J., Benival, D., & Kommineni, N. (2023). Chitosan: A potential biopolymer in drug delivery and biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics, 15(4), 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041313
- Dheyab, M. A., Aziz, A. A., Jameel, M. S., Noqta, O. A., & Mehrdel, B. (2020). Synthesis and coating methods of biocompatible iron oxide/gold nanoparticle and nanocomposite for biomedical applications. Chinese Journal of Physics, 64, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2019.11.014
- Dippong, T., Levei, E. A., & Cadar, O. (2021). Recent advances in synthesis and applications of MFe2O4 (M=Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Zn) nanoparticles. Nanomaterials, 11(6), 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061560
- Dolmans, D. E. J. G. J., Fukumura, D., & Jain, R. K. (2003). Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nature Reviews. Cancer, 3(5), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1071
- Dulińska-Litewka, J., Łazarczyk, A., Hałubiec, P., Szafrański, O., Karnas, K., & Karewicz, A. (2019). Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles-current and prospective medical applications. Materials, 12(4), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12040617
- Espinosa, A., Kolosnjaj-Tabi, J., Abou-Hassan, A., Plan Sangnier, A., Curcio, A., Silva, A. K. A., Di Corato, R., Neveu, S., Pellegrino, T., Liz-Marzán, L. M., & Wilhelm, C. (2018). Magnetic (hyper) Thermia or Photothermia? Progressive comparison of iron oxide and gold nanoparticles heating in water, in Cells, and in vivo. In Advanced Functional Materials, 28(37), Article 1803660. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201803660
- Estelrich, J., & Busquets, M. A. (2018). Iron oxide nanoparticles in photothermal therapy. Molecules, 23(7), 1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071567
- Etemadi, H., & Plieger, P. G. (2020). Magnetic fluid hyperthermia based on magnetic nanoparticles: Physical characteristics, historical perspective, clinical trials, technological challenges and recent advances. Advanced Therapeutics, 3(11), Article 2000061. https://doi.org/10.1002/adtp.202000061
- Farinha, P., Coelho, J. M. P., Reis, C. P., & Gaspar, M. M. (2021). A comprehensive updated review on magnetic nanoparticles in diagnostics. Nanomaterials, 11(12), 3432. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123432
- Fereshteh, Z., & Salavati-Niasari, M. (2017). Effect of ligand on particle size and morphology of nanostructures synthesized by thermal decomposition of coordination compounds. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 243, 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.03.001
- Forge, D., Roch, A., Laurent, S., Tellez, H., Gossuin, Y., Renaux, F., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008). Optimization of the synthesis of superparamagnetic contrast agents by the design of experiments method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112(49), 19178–19185. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp803832k
- Giménez, M. C., Luxwolda, M., Van Stipriaan, E. G., Bollen, P. P., Hoekman, R. L., Koopmans, M. A., Arany, P. R., Krames, M. R., Berends, A. C., Hut, R. A., & Gordijn, M. C. M. (2022). Effects of near-infrared light on well-being and health in human subjects with mild sleep-related complaints: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Biology, 12(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010060
- Grancharova, T., Zagorchev, P., & Pilicheva, B. Iron oxide nanoparticles as photothermal agents: Optimal parameters for photoconversion efficiency and ability for synergistic cancer Treatment 2024.
- Grosvenor, A. P., Kobe, B. A., Biesinger, M. C., & McIntyre, N. S. (2004). Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surface and Interface Analysis, 36(12), 1564–1574. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1984
- Guo, J., Wei, W., Zhao, Y., & Dai, H. (2022). Iron oxide nanoparticles with photothermal performance and enhanced nanozyme activity for bacteria-infected wound therapy. Regenerative Biomaterials, 9, Article rbac041. https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbac041
- Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144(5), 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
- He, X., Zhong, W., Au, C.-T., & Du, Y. (2013). Size dependence of the magnetic properties of Ni nanoparticles prepared by thermal decomposition method. Nanoscale Research Letters, 8(1), 446. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-446
- Hufschmid, R., Arami, H., Ferguson, R. M., Gonzales, M., Teeman, E., Brush, L. N., Browning, N. D., & Krishnan, K. M. (2015). Synthesis of phase-pure and monodisperse iron oxide nanoparticles by thermal decomposition. Nanoscale, 7(25), 11142–11154. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR01651G
- Ismail, A. F., Khulbe, K. C., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A., Khulbe, K., & Matsuura, T. (2019). RO membrane characterization. In Reverse osmosis (pp. 57–90). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811468-1.00003-7
- Jang, B., Kwon, H., Katila, P., Lee, S. J., & Lee, H. (2016). Dual delivery of biological therapeutics for multimodal and synergistic cancer therapies. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 98, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.023
- Karakoti, A. S., Shukla, R., Shanker, R., & Singh, S. (2015). Surface functionalization of quantum dots for biological applications. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 215, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.11.004
- Khatua, R., Bhar, B., Dey, S., Jaiswal, C., J, V., & Mandal, B. B. (2024). Advances in engineered nanosystems: Immunomodulatory interactions for therapeutic applications. Nanoscale, 16(27), 12820–12856. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NR00680A
- Khorana, A. A., Mangu, P. B., Berlin, J., Engebretson, A., Hong, T. S., Maitra, A., Mohile, S. G., Mumber, M., Schulick, R., Shapiro, M., Urba, S., Zeh, H. J., & Katz, M. H. G. (2016). Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(21), 2541–2556. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.5553
- Kluge, S., Deng, L., Feroughi, O., Schneider, F., Poliak, M., Fomin, A., Tsionsky, V., Cheskis, S., Wlokas, I., Rahinov, I., Dreier, T., Kempf, A., Wiggers, H., & Schulz, C. (2015). Initial reaction steps during flame synthesis of iron-oxide nanoparticles. CrystEngComm, 17(36), 6930–6939. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE00456J
- Koopmans, G. F., Hiemstra, T., Vaseur, C., Chardon, W. J., Voegelin, A., & Groenenberg, J. E. (2020). Use of iron oxide nanoparticles for immobilizing phosphorus in-situ: Increase in soil reactive surface area and effect on soluble phosphorus. The Science of the Total Environment, 711, Article 135220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135220
- Lim, J., Sim, K., & Lee, J.-K. (2016). Synthesis of hierarchical iron oxide nanostructures from primary nanoparticles and their morphology control via hydrolysis. CrystEngComm, 18(12), 2155–2162. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE02580J
- Ling, D., Park, W., Park, S.-J., Lu, Y., Kim, K. S., Hackett, M. J., Kim, B. H., Yim, H., Jeon, Y. S., Na, K., & Hyeon, T. (2014). Multifunctional tumor pH-sensitive self-assembled nanoparticles for bimodal imaging and treatment of resistant heterogeneous tumors. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136(15), 5647–5655. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4108287
- Liu, S., Qin, S., He, M., Zhou, D., Qin, Q., & Wang, H. (2020). Current applications of poly (lactic acid) composites in tissue engineering and drug delivery. Composites Part B Engineering, 199, Article 108238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108238
- Liu, T., Shi, S., Liang, C., Shen, S., Cheng, L., Wang, C., Song, X., Goel, S., Barnhart, T. E., Cai, W., & Liu, Z. (2015). Iron oxide decorated MoS 2 nanosheets with double PEGylation for chelator-free radiolabeling and multimodal imaging guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano, 9(1), 950–960. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506757x
- Malik, M. A., Wani, M. Y., & Hashim, M. A. (2012). Microemulsion method: A novel route to synthesize organic and inorganic nanomaterials. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 5(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.09.027
- Marín, T., Montoya, P., Arnache, O., & Calderón, J. (2016). Influence of surface treatment on magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized by electrochemical method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, 120(27), 6634–6645. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01796
- Martinez-Boubeta, C., Simeonidis, K., Makridis, A., Angelakeris, M., Iglesias, O., Guardia, P., Cabot, A., Yedra, L., Estradé, S., Peiró, F., Saghi, Z., Midgley, P. A., Conde-Leborán, I., Serantes, D., & Baldomir, D. (2013). Learning from nature to improve the heat generation of iron-oxide nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia applications. Scientific Reports, 3, 1652. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01652
- Mascolo, M. C., Pei, Y., & Ring, T. A. (2013). Room temperature co-precipitation synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles in a large pH window with different bases. Materials, 6(12), 5549–5567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6125549
- McCullough, L. E., Winn, R. A., Teras, L. R., & Patel, A. V. (2025). Retrieved August 17, 2024, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer. The American Cancer Society launches the VOICES of Black Women, a longitudinal population cohort study. Cancer, 131(5), Article e35775. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35775
- Meng, Y. Q., Shi, Y. N., Zhu, Y. P., Liu, Y. Q., Gu, L. W., Liu, D. D., Ma, A., Xia, F., Guo, Q. Y., Xu, C. C., Zhang, J. Z., Qiu, C., & Wang, J. G. (2024). Recent trends in preparation and biomedical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 22(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02235-0
- Mihai, A. D., Chircov, C., Grumezescu, A. M., & Holban, A. M. (2020). Magnetite Nanoparticles and Essential Oils Systems for Advanced Antibacterial Therapies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(19), 7355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197355
- Modena, M. M., Rühle, B., Burg, T. P., & Wuttke, S. (2019). Nanoparticle characterization: What to measure? Advanced Materials, 31(32), Article e1901556. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901556
- Mohammadi, A., Barikani, M., & Barmar, M. (2013). Effect of surface modification of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on thermal and mechanical properties of magnetic polyurethane elastomer nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science, 48(21), 7493–7502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7563-7
- Montiel Schneider, M. G., Martín, M. J., Otarola, J., Vakarelska, E., Simeonov, V., Lassalle, V., & Nedyalkova, M. (2022). Biomedical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles: Current insights progress and perspectives. Pharmaceutics, 14(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14010204
- Mourdikoudis, S., Pallares, R. M., & Thanh, N. T. K. (2018). Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: Comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale, 10(27), 12871–12934. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR02278J
- Mulens-Arias, V., Rojas, J. M., & Barber, D. F. (2021). The use of iron oxide nanoparticles to reprogram macrophage responses and the immunological tumor microenvironment. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, Article 693709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.693709
- Niculescu, A.-G., Chircov, C., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2022). Magnetite nanoparticles: Synthesis methods – A comparative review. Methods, 199, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.018
- Obaidat, I. M., Narayanaswamy, V., Alaabed, S., Sambasivam, S., & Muralee Gopi, C. V. V. (2019). Principles of magnetic hyperthermia: A focus on using multifunctional hybrid magnetic nanoparticles. Magnetochemistry, 5(4), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry5040067
- Parashar, M., Shukla, V. K., & Singh, R. (2020). Metal oxides nanoparticles via sol–gel method: A review on synthesis, characterization and applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 31(5), 3729–3749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-02994-8
- Ramimoghadam, D., Bagheri, S., & Hamid, S. B. A. (2014). Progress in electrochemical synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 368, 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.05.015
- Rashid, H., Mansoor, M. A., Haider, B., Nasir, R., Abd Hamid, S. B., & Abdulrahman, A. (2020). Synthesis and characterization of magnetite nano particles with high selectivity using in-situ precipitation method. Separation Science and Technology, 55(6), 1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2019.1585876
- Rethi, L., Rethi, L., Liu, C.-H., Hyun, T. V., Chen, C.-H., & Chuang, E.-Y. (2023). Fortification of iron oxide as sustainable nanoparticles: An amalgamation with magnetic/photo responsive cancer therapies. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 18, 5607–5623. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S404394
- Roca, A. G., Gutiérrez, L., Gavilán, H., Fortes Brollo, M. E., Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S., & Morales, M. D. P. (2019). Design strategies for shape-controlled magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 138, 68–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.008
- Roth, H.-C., Schwaminger, S., Fraga García, P., Ritscher, J., & Berensmeier, S. (2016). Oleate coating of iron oxide nanoparticles in aqueous systems: The role of temperature and surfactant concentration. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3405-2
- Ru, B., Wong, C. N., Tong, Y., Zhong, J. Y., Zhong, S. S. W., Wu, W. C., Chu, K. C., Wong, C. Y., Lau, C. Y., Chen, I., Chan, N. W., & Zhang, J. (2019). TISIDB: An integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions. Bioinformatics, 35(20), 4200–4202. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz210
- Saleem, Q., Torabfam, M., Fidan, T., Kurt, H., Yüce, M., Clarke, N., & Bayazit, M. K. (2021). Microwave-promoted continuous flow systems in nanoparticle synthesis-A perspective. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 9(30), 9988–10015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02695
- Sharma, R. K., Dutta, S., Sharma, S., Zboril, R., Varma, R. S., & Gawande, M. B. (2016). Fe3O4 (iron oxide)-supported nanocatalysts: Synthesis, characterization and applications in coupling reactions. Green Chemistry, 18(11), 3184–3209. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC00864J
- Sharma, S., Sudhakara, P., Singh, J., Ilyas, R. A., Asyraf, M. R. M., & Razman, M. R. (2021). Critical review of biodegradable and bioactive polymer composites for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery applications. Polymers, 13(16), 2623. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162623
- Shi, L., Zhang, J., Zhao, M., Tang, S., Cheng, X., Zhang, W., Li, W., Liu, X., Peng, H., & Wang, Q. (2021). Effects of polyethylene glycol on the surface of nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery. Nanoscale, 13(24), 10748–10764. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NR02065J
- Singh, J. P., Kumar, M., Sharma, A., Pandey, G., Chae, K. H., & Lee, S. (2020). Bottom-up and top-down approaches for MgO. Sonochemical Reactions, 58.
- Soenen, S. J., Parak, W. J., Rejman, J., & Manshian, B. (2015). Cellular stability of inorganic nanoparticles: Effects on cytotoxicity, particle functionality and biomedical applications. Chemical Reviews, 115(5), 2109–2135. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400714j
- Thanh, N. T. Magnetic nanoparticles: From fabrication to clinical applications 2012.
- Theiss, F. L., Ayoko, G. A., & Frost, R. L. (2016). Synthesis of layered double hydroxides containing Mg2+, Zn2+, Ca2+ and Al3+ layer cations by co-precipitation methods-A review. Applied Surface Science, 383, 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.150
- Vallabani, N. V. S., & Singh, S. (2018). Recent advances and future prospects of iron oxide nanoparticles in biomedicine and diagnostics. 3 Biotech, 8(6), 279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1286-z
- Vassallo, M., Martella, D., Barrera, G., Celegato, F., Coïsson, M., Ferrero, R., Olivetti, E. S., Troia, A., Sözeri, H., Parmeggiani, C., Wiersma, D. S., Tiberto, P., & Manzin, A. (2023). Improvement of hyperthermia properties of iron oxide nanoparticles by surface coating. ACS Omega, 8(2), 2143–2154. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06244
- Vilgelm, A. E., & Richmond, A. (2019). Chemokines modulate immune surveillance in tumorigenesis, metastasis and response to immunotherapy. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 333. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00333
- Wild, C. P. (2012). The role of cancer research in noncommunicable disease control. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104(14), 1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs262
- Workie, A. B., Ningsih, H. S., & Shih, S.-J. (2023). An comprehensive review on the spray pyrolysis technique: Historical context, operational factors, classifications and product applications. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 170, Article 105915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2023.105915
- Wu, W., Wu, Z., Yu, T., Jiang, C., & Kim, W.-S. (2015). Recent progress on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, surface functional strategies and biomedical applications. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 16(2), Article 023501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/16/2/023501
- Xu, Y., Zheng, H., Schumacher, D., Liehn, E. A., Slabu, I., & Rusu, M. (2021). Recent advancements of specific functionalized surfaces of magnetic nano- and microparticles as a theranostics source in biomedicine. ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, 7(6), 1914–1932. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01393
- Yang, D., Yang, G., Yang, P., Lv, R., Gai, S., Li, C., He, F., & Lin, J. (2017). Assembly of Au plasmonic photothermal agent and iron oxide nanoparticles on ultrathin black phosphorus for targeted photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy. Advanced Functional Materials, 27(18), Article 1700371. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700371
- Yang, Y., Li, C.-W., Chan, L.-C., Wei, Y., Hsu, J.-M., Xia, W., Cha, J.-H., Hou, J., Hsu, J. L., Sun, L., & Hung, M.-C. (2018). Exosomal PD-L1 harbors active defense function to suppress T cell killing of breast cancer cells and promote tumor growth. Cell Research, 28(8), 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0060-4
- Yu, S., Xia, G., Yang, N., Yuan, L., Li, J., Wang, Q., Li, D., Ding, L., Fan, Z., & Li, J. (2024). Noble metal nanoparticle-based photothermal therapy: Development and application in effective cancer therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(11), 5632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115632
- Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Guan, X., Zhang, W., & Ma, J. (2021). Recent advances in selective photothermal therapy of tumor. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 19(1), 335. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01080-3